|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 24
|
![]() Seems they dont want us to rely on lich damage alone and are throwing us a bone to compensate by increasing our dot damage.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 70
|
![]() It would be interesting to see parses with the new DoT enhancements taken into account. If we were losing 10-ish % overall just accounting for the Lich changes, my guess is that number will drop a bit more taking into account the increased DoT damage. Glad the Devs explained the reasoning behind the Lich changes. Communication is a good thing. :smileyhappy:
__________________
----------------------------- Patch - Feta - Havarti Voices Within ** Will heal/nuke/bonk for sig... ** |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 850
|
![]() It's only the second time ever a dev has posted in a necro specific thread... there's been a response in a summoner one that dealt with us as well as a priest one that applied to us but only the old necro bug thread and now the lich change thread have gotten specific necro information in a necro specific thread. Hopefully, they'll keep up the trend of communication.
__________________
Want to learn about Necromancers? Check out The Necromancer FAQ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 49
|
![]() Same here El...I'm just happy the we are getting the DEV's attention.... Kikko
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 12
|
![]() I can see if they increased damage on all our spells it might make up for 50% of the damage we will lose. This is typical of soe instead of fixing the problem they just say instaed we will just F&*K the class because it seems they don't like the Necromancer class and it will be the last class to be fixed last or maybe never.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
General
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,084
|
![]()
OK, This is getting poopie! This Thunderguard system blows chunks!!
Message Edited by Zald on 11-09-2005 03:32 PM |
![]() |
![]() |