|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Fansite Staff
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 849
|
![]()
With the new mini content release www.eq2llinks.com has over 50k items available, over 200k drop locations (collections included) I've been asked recently why did I start an item database site (www.eq2llinks.com). To be honest I said, why not? I missed www.eq2linky.com and wanted something that wasn't client side heavy as eq2idb. Recently I've seen a few other Item sites pop up... And I'm looking to expand eq2llinks.com to be the best site available site. But I am hitting a road block when it comes to content. I am currently the only one supporting the site and am unable to do content changes on the scale that is needed. So, whats in a name? Why did I choose eq2LLinks. Well... I have an affinity for double letters in user names, and I like the sound of eq2links, but alias that domain name was taken. What I really wanted to do was make a name that people would remember, and I think the LL makes it distinct enough that its hard to forget the domain (for me it is at least). To be fair I have some up and coming sites that do a very good job (in some ways better than my site) take the poll so I can figure out where I stand in the TINY world of in game item links. I'm actively looking for help. send an e-mail to webmaster(@)eq2llinks.com. Remove the ( around the ) @ to send the e-mail or just type out the real e-mail address. =) I think with a little more polish and some additional features, the website would be the best by far. =)
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 39
|
![]()
Jida wrote:
To be honest I said, why not? I missed www.eq2linky.com and wanted something that wasn't client side heavy as eq2idb.I use the eq2idb web interface and prefer it to any other program/site out there because of the nice advanced search parameters and the one button link copy (in Forefox too! not just ie) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fansite Staff
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 849
|
![]()
When it first came out it was very laggy and required a lot of web traffic to get what was needed to search and whatnot. I do not know what it's like anymore =) That was over a year ago, i hope that the client has seen performance increases since then =)
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |