EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire

 

Go Back   EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire > EverQuest II > General EverQuest II Discussion > Zones and Population
Members List

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 04-21-2008, 05:43 PM   #1
craiglitw

Loremaster
craiglitw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Default

Been doing Korsha for a while and we have both petitioned and bugged the fact that the 2nd group encounter still drops no chest.  We assumed GU44 might fix it but once again no chest.  Is this on purpose then?

craiglitw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2008, 06:20 PM   #2
Lader

Loremaster
Lader's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 591
Default

ive figured it was always intended to only drop the box for the statue.
__________________
-Thanatosis: 90 defiler of Oasis
Lader is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2008, 06:31 PM   #3
Ama

General
Ama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,833
Default

Lader wrote:
ive figured it was always intended to only drop the box for the statue.
I do find it kind of lame that it has no chest drop, but our raid has gotten used to that fact.  It should atleast examine the raid and have a potential chance to drop 1-2 master I spells imho.
__________________
Ama is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-21-2008, 11:43 PM   #4
ReficulFonwaps

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 161
Default

It is quite lame tbh. What is the reason for this anyways?
ReficulFonwaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2008, 05:21 AM   #5
Troubor

Loremaster
Troubor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: My Felwithe Mansion (and a couple other smaller homes), currently.
Posts: 1,416
Default

My guess is the same as Lader's, that one only exists to activate the statue.  Past that no idea...maybe they wanted to make the statue have to take an extra step before it's active?  And/or they only wanted so many items to drop from the zone?    Guess it's a non quest way of "gaining access" to one named.  Have assumed it's intentional, they must know by now they have no true loot table.
__________________
Troubor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2008, 02:39 PM   #6
Spite

Loremaster
Spite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 222
Default

I have an idea - how about you add the SoH trash loot drops to this encounter?

How [Removed for Content] is it that a named encounter in this zone drops nothing when trash in SoH has a chance at uber loot?

Spite is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2008, 04:14 PM   #7
Wilin

Loremaster
Wilin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,151
Default

I have to agree. This is not a trash fight and all it drops is a key to trigger a named.

It would be kinda like fighting Ludmila's party in PR and only getting the sounding staff out of it.

__________________
Wilin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-22-2008, 04:41 PM   #8
KBern

Loremaster
KBern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
Default

Lader wrote:
ive figured it was always intended to only drop the box for the statue.
That is all it is for.  It is not bugged, there is no loot to get on those mobs.
__________________
KBern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-23-2008, 05:22 AM   #9
Druid03

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 418
Default

these mobs are easy enough, just pretend the clicky to activate the statue is your rewardif there's something wrong in this zone is that stupid statue always droping that lame 2h staff SMILEYwe did think it was pretty lame the 1st time we were in Kor-Sha, but i guess we got used to it
__________________
Tieron
Troubador 92
Druid03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-23-2008, 10:40 AM   #10
Obadiah

Loremaster
Obadiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,154
Default

Wilin wrote:

I have to agree. This is not a trash fight and all it drops is a key to trigger a named.

It would be kinda like fighting Ludmila's party in PR and only getting the sounding staff out of it.

Excellent comparison. Yes, it seems apparent by now that it was intentional that they only drop the box, but that doesn't make it any less silly. I still think that's the toughest encounter in the zone with the exception of the Overking.
__________________
Obadiah is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-23-2008, 12:16 PM   #11
KBern

Loremaster
KBern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
Default

Kurgan@Everfrost wrote:
Wilin wrote:

I have to agree. This is not a trash fight and all it drops is a key to trigger a named.

It would be kinda like fighting Ludmila's party in PR and only getting the sounding staff out of it.

Excellent comparison. Yes, it seems apparent by now that it was intentional that they only drop the box, but that doesn't make it any less silly. I still think that's the toughest encounter in the zone with the exception of the Overking.
I have to say the twins have a little more of a challenge than this encounter...this one is simply have tank in room and slowly kills the mobs...nothing challenging at all really.
__________________
KBern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-26-2008, 04:13 PM   #12
Troubor

Loremaster
Troubor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: My Felwithe Mansion (and a couple other smaller homes), currently.
Posts: 1,416
Default

Druid03 wrote:
these mobs are easy enough, just pretend the clicky to activate the statue is your rewardif there's something wrong in this zone is that stupid statue always droping that lame 2h staff SMILEYwe did think it was pretty lame the 1st time we were in Kor-Sha, but i guess we got used to it
We've been lucky, haven't seen the staff for a while.  But we have had sprees where he did just keep dropping that for a long while.  That or a healer's earring forever.  He's been a bit more random for us recently though.
__________________
Troubor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-27-2008, 01:36 PM   #13
Ama

General
Ama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,833
Default

Well I do hope the developers consider upgrading this mob to drop something.  Having them drop 2 chromatic essences won't kill anything or atleast 1 master spell. 

The encounter can be difficult for first timers and it will only serve to aggrivate them seeing it drops no chest.  Also I do agree with Wilin in that this fight is basically like fighting that PR group just to get the staff of sounding. 

__________________
Ama is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-28-2008, 11:36 AM   #14
KBern

Loremaster
KBern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
Default

If it makes you feel better you can simply think of them as a step in a larger encounter, like some adds that you have to deal with that do not drop loot, but need to die anyway.

It just has more of a gap between this fight and the next loot dropping fight.

__________________
KBern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-28-2008, 03:49 PM   #15
craiglitw

Loremaster
craiglitw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Default

This encounter needs to drop loot, its difficulty is greater than the skeletons in PR, and they drop set loot.  This needs to drop set pieces at a minimum.
craiglitw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-28-2008, 04:23 PM   #16
Geothe

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,098
Default

No need for loot on this "fight" at all.Its sole purpose is to get an item to activate the next name.

__________________
Smed: We aren't going to be allowing RMT in any way, shape or form on the non-exchange enabled EQ II servers. Period. End of statement.

Smed: 5) This [LoN] is not some slippery slope towards selling items directly in EQ & EQ II.

Lie #3: Station Cash. Enough Said.

Geothe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-28-2008, 06:18 PM   #17
craiglitw

Loremaster
craiglitw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Default

Then there is no need for loot on the ludmilla fight either, or any fight at all since it all leads to killing trak ..

craiglitw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-28-2008, 08:22 PM   #18
Ama

General
Ama's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,833
Default

craiglitw wrote:

Then there is no need for loot on the ludmilla fight either, or any fight at all since it all leads to killing trak ..

QFE

Epic Mob = Loot PERIOD!

__________________
Ama is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2008, 10:33 AM   #19
KBern

Loremaster
KBern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
Default

Amana wrote:
craiglitw wrote:

Then there is no need for loot on the ludmilla fight either, or any fight at all since it all leads to killing trak ..

QFE

Epic Mob = Loot PERIOD!

Do you all actually play the game?  Honestly?

This is nothing new....it is trash you need to clear to get to the next step in the zone.  Fairly simple concept for people without dreams of loot blocking their common sense.

Ever been to Deathtoll in KoS?  Have to get by the first mob blocking the hallway....get any loot from that?

This fight is not even hard, get over it already.

__________________
KBern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2008, 10:40 AM   #20
Geothe

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,098
Default

Amana wrote:
craiglitw wrote:

Then there is no need for loot on the ludmilla fight either, or any fight at all since it all leads to killing trak ..

QFE

Epic Mob = Loot PERIOD!

[Removed for Content].Riiiiiiggghhht.

Raid more.kthanks

__________________
Smed: We aren't going to be allowing RMT in any way, shape or form on the non-exchange enabled EQ II servers. Period. End of statement.

Smed: 5) This [LoN] is not some slippery slope towards selling items directly in EQ & EQ II.

Lie #3: Station Cash. Enough Said.

Geothe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2008, 05:25 PM   #21
craiglitw

Loremaster
craiglitw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Default

Yes, I've been to deathtoll, the first mob pales in comparison to any named in the zone.  There is zero comparison there.  I cleared that zone every friday night for months on end till EoF came out.

Thanks for the insults also, not sure why when you are anonymous and not face to face you talk down to people, grow up.

Back on topic this group encounter is harder than the first large golem encounter.  We can three group the golem but we can't three group the second encounter, there is a large difference between them and therefore should drop loot like the first encounter does.

craiglitw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2008, 05:55 PM   #22
KBern

Loremaster
KBern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
Default

craiglitw wrote:

Yes, I've been to deathtoll, the first mob pales in comparison to any named in the zone.  There is zero comparison there.  I cleared that zone every friday night for months on end till EoF came out.

Thanks for the insults also, not sure why when you are anonymous and not face to face you talk down to people, grow up.

Back on topic this group encounter is harder than the first large golem encounter.  We can three group the golem but we can't three group the second encounter, there is a large difference between them and therefore should drop loot like the first encounter does.

Anonymous?  You have my name, server, guild, and rank...want my social security number too?

Sorry...you are whining about something that is ridiculous.  It is part of the zone, part of the script, and no loot drops.  You need to beat this encounter to get to the loot in the rest of the zone.

Deal with it, working as intended. 

Yes, I have no patience for selfish entitlement posts.

__________________
KBern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-29-2008, 06:32 PM   #23
craiglitw

Loremaster
craiglitw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 18
Default

Its not an entitlement post, its an overlooked issue.  You would be liar to say the first time you killed it you didn't look around for a chest.  This is completely out of place.
craiglitw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-30-2008, 09:39 AM   #24
KBern

Loremaster
KBern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
Default

craiglitw wrote:
Its not an entitlement post, its an overlooked issue.  You would be liar to say the first time you killed it you didn't look around for a chest.  This is completely out of place.

I would be a liar to say that I don't look for a chest on ANY mob that I kill, but once I learn how that particular mob works and why....I realize I should stop looking.

__________________
KBern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2008, 11:47 AM   #25
rollandheat

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
Default

It is the Capital letters in the name of the mobs in this encounter. Either add loot, or change names. Both ways work.
rollandheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2008, 12:19 PM   #26
Geothe

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,098
Default

rollandheat wrote:
It is the Capital letters in the name of the mobs in this encounter. Either add loot, or change names. Both ways work.

Yeah!AND!Add loot tables to every single Vamp in Castle Mistoore cause they all have Capital Letters in their names too!!ANDI want AA xp for killing each of them because they all have Capital Letters in their names too!!!

__________________
Smed: We aren't going to be allowing RMT in any way, shape or form on the non-exchange enabled EQ II servers. Period. End of statement.

Smed: 5) This [LoN] is not some slippery slope towards selling items directly in EQ & EQ II.

Lie #3: Station Cash. Enough Said.

Geothe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-05-2008, 02:41 PM   #27
gatrm

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 545
Default

Despite what certain elitists on this board think, it is a difficult encounter.  It  is far more difficult than either the statue or the big golem and it is far more difficult than any encounter in PR, yet there's no loot table.  Those of us who think it should be changed understand that it is working as intended and there isnt SUPPOSED to be loot included, however we also believe that it SHOULD have a loot table, afterall, far easier fights do have loot.

It's easy to say "get over it" or "get used to it", but most non-VP raid forces have to use tactics and multiple pulls to beat this encounter- and it would be appropriate based on its difficulty if it had a loot table.

gatrm is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-06-2008, 11:54 AM   #28
rollandheat

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
Default

.
rollandheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-06-2008, 11:55 AM   #29
rollandheat

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 45
Default

Geothe wrote:
rollandheat wrote:Yeah!

AND!Add loot tables to every single Vamp in Castle Mistoore cause they all have Capital Letters in their names too!!ANDI want AA xp for killing each of them because they all have Capital Letters in their names too!!!

The Mistmore castle is bad example for capital letters in mobs names. All mobs there have them, in Kor-Sha golems and other trash dont. This makes it different. And also they have "normal" name, not a word pointing to membership in some clan (like Danak etc)You, however, figured another solution. Make golem names with capital letters, problem solved. Again.
rollandheat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-06-2008, 12:37 PM   #30
Wilin

Loremaster
Wilin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,151
Default

This fight is easy after you figure it out. But, I would like another guaranteed chest in the zone please. SMILEY

__________________
Wilin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 PM.

vBulletin skin by: CompleteGFX.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All threads and posts originally from the EQ2 and Station forums operated by Sony Online Entertainment. Their use is by express written permission.