EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire

 

Go Back   EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire > EverQuest II > Class Discussion > Priest's Sanctum > Inquisitor
Members List

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 07-26-2006, 05:54 PM   #1
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default

So we were fighting in Lyceum a couple of night ago and at 1% I tried once again to kill "Gnillaw the Demented" at the right time to pwn him when he deathsaves.  But.....I cast verdict and BOOM! 1.5 seconds later i go from full HP to 1HP.  Needless to say 3 people try to rez me as i look dead.  This was a definitly a hallmark for myself.  Go Verdict go.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-26-2006, 07:23 PM   #2
inhumanus1986

Loremaster
inhumanus1986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 103
Default

[expletive haxx0red by Raijinn]!!!!!!!!! LOL
inhumanus1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-27-2006, 12:30 AM   #3
Fon

 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7
Default

Hahahaha! Oh man, good times. SMILEY
__________________
Geezo Sneezo
Retired Officer of The Last Word
Fon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-27-2006, 07:07 AM   #4
Kadurm

Tester
Kadurm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 424
Default

Umm yeah, gotta watch who you got targeted when that one goes off. Kinda like the lightsocket and the fork routine, You only do it once!
Kadurm is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-27-2006, 08:29 PM   #5
Listad12

Loremaster
Listad12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 60
Default

holy [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn], so all those times our MT went down was because of Verdict ?
 
oh [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn] !
Listad12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-27-2006, 08:39 PM   #6
Shailen

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 391
Default

So silly question.  What was your health at when you cast it?  Maybe this will answer the standing question of what the % is that players need to be at for this to work.
__________________
_____________________________
Shailon - 70 - Inquisitor - Venekor
Shailen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-28-2006, 06:13 AM   #7
hardwi

General
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 14
Default

lol Nothing like owning yourself.

 

hardwi is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-28-2006, 05:24 PM   #8
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default


Shailen wrote:
So silly question.  What was your health at when you cast it?  Maybe this will answer the standing question of what the % is that players need to be at for this to work.

As stated in the my first post, i was at Full HP.  I still have no freakin' idea how it happened.  but every time i fight that mob i try and replicate it.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-28-2006, 09:53 PM   #9
SorrySonOfA

Loremaster
SorrySonOfA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 114
Default

Doesn't a troubador have a spell that has a % chance to completly reflect incoming damage back at a caster?  Thought I remembered that, if that is correct, maybe there is a bit of a bard to that mob, and you just got very very very unlucky.
__________________
SorrySonOfA is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-28-2006, 09:55 PM   #10
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default

Yea there are a few mobs out there that can reflect spells.  I have never known this guy to be one of those mobs though.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-28-2006, 10:00 PM   #11
Vicenzo

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 88
Default

Did you get AA?  Or drop any decent loot?
__________________
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
In nothing do men more nearly approach the gods than in giving health to others. ~Cicero
Vicenzo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-28-2006, 10:15 PM   #12
Jordinn

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 55
Default

Gnillaw doesn't reflect that I know of.  That's sort of funny and now I want to log on and try it  SMILEY 

FYI I have tried to cast Verdict through the tank implied target and it won't cast, you don't verdict the tank.  That would suck.

__________________
Jordinn, 70 Troubador
Epicure, 70 Inquisitor
Cataclysm
Permafrost
Jordinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-30-2006, 08:22 PM   #13
Tarta

Loremaster
Tarta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 106
Default



Jordinn wrote:

Gnillaw doesn't reflect that I know of.  That's sort of funny and now I want to log on and try it  SMILEY 

FYI I have tried to cast Verdict through the tank implied target and it won't cast, you don't verdict the tank.  That would suck.




Huh? I use implied target for verdict always.. as in every single time. Of course it does not hit the tank, it works just like any other offensive spell does. And, I must say, it alwasy works, too. I love the big blue gavel!

That said, I'd ove to know how the OP ended up verdicting himself... That's just bizarre (esp. from full health) - must be some sort of bug. Do you have the log to show what happened? Perhaps you could paste it in here for us to see, too.

Tarta - 70 inqui - Guk

 

 

Tarta is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-30-2006, 11:30 PM   #14
Lanfeare

Loremaster
Lanfeare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 65
Default

Out of curiosity did it say in your logs how much it hit for etc?
__________________
I don't care about the state of my mind as I know its good for nothing but its left yours behind.



Lanfeare is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 12:42 AM   #15
Shailen

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 391
Default

I'd guess bug, but there are spells that do strange things for targetting.  I know Jesters Cap, if cast on a person outside of combat, will end up landing on their implied target instead of them, but if you've started fighting it will land on the person who's targetted.Makes no sense to me, and I'm pretty sure its a bug.  This may be one as well.  It might only happening if your targetting yourself.  Thats the only time I know of that both the target and implied target are the same (besides when they're both empty)
__________________
_____________________________
Shailon - 70 - Inquisitor - Venekor
Shailen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 05:27 PM   #16
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default

Aye, i am still considiering it a bug.  I have tried to reproduce it without success.  But, I was targeting the mob directly.  Don't have the log for it because I leave the part to the number crunchers in the guild. "I just spam da heals der boss."
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:06 PM   #17
Pins

General
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,040
Default


Jordinn wrote:

Gnillaw doesn't reflect that I know of.  That's sort of funny and now I want to log on and try it  SMILEY 

FYI I have tried to cast Verdict through the tank implied target and it won't cast, you don't verdict the tank.  That would suck.


Gnillaw reflects a few spells after he does his heal. You were too late on the Verdict, and he did his heal+reflect combo.
__________________
Calaglin, Former Illusionist/Guild Leader of Dissolution on Nektulos

Calaglin, Former Illusionist/Guild Leader of Confirmed on Unrest
Pins is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:16 PM   #18
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default


Pinski wrote:

Jordinn wrote:

Gnillaw doesn't reflect that I know of.  That's sort of funny and now I want to log on and try it  SMILEY 

FYI I have tried to cast Verdict through the tank implied target and it won't cast, you don't verdict the tank.  That would suck.


Gnillaw reflects a few spells after he does his heal. You were too late on the Verdict, and he did his heal+reflect combo.
Cool, thanks for the info, that would explain it.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:20 PM   #19
Jordinn

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 55
Default

On Gnillaw:  Wow I never noticed he reflected at all.  Good to know.  SMILEY

On Verdict through implied target: odd that it worked for you, I've had it fail to cast on several occasions on several mobs and targeting directly worked.  I was watching mob health and didn't cast until it was at 2%, and then when it failed had to retarget and retry getting thecast off at about 1%.  I'll have to play with this to see what I'm doing or how it isn't working correctly.

__________________
Jordinn, 70 Troubador
Epicure, 70 Inquisitor
Cataclysm
Permafrost
Jordinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:35 PM   #20
Shailen

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 391
Default


Jordinn wrote:

On Gnillaw:  Wow I never noticed he reflected at all.  Good to know.  SMILEY

On Verdict through implied target: odd that it worked for you, I've had it fail to cast on several occasions on several mobs and targeting directly worked.  I was watching mob health and didn't cast until it was at 2%, and then when it failed had to retarget and retry getting thecast off at about 1%.  I'll have to play with this to see what I'm doing or how it isn't working correctly.


I doubt that had to do with targetting.  I suspect it just got resisted.I'd say 95% ot the times I've used verdict its been through the implied target of our MT, since with very few exceptions I'm targetting him all the time at the end of a raid.
__________________
_____________________________
Shailon - 70 - Inquisitor - Venekor
Shailen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:35 PM   #21
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default

I typically always target the mob anyways incase the MT loose agro i can give who ever is tanking it a small fighting chance to live.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:43 PM   #22
Jordinn

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 55
Default

I do both depending on the mob and how our raid force is doing that night on holding agro.  When we get "experimental" I Often heal through the mob for that reason SMILEY  Otherwise I target MT and swap targets to spot heal.

EDIT: Typos

Message Edited by Jordinn on 07-31-2006 10:44 AM

__________________
Jordinn, 70 Troubador
Epicure, 70 Inquisitor
Cataclysm
Permafrost
Jordinn is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 09:48 PM   #23
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default

Noe Edittting of Typeos'.  Uncut, Puur, All-Nattural.  Thast' they way I prefer it.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 07-31-2006, 10:30 PM   #24
Shailen

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 391
Default

I do both depending on the fight, but when it ends up being verdict time I seem to find myself targeting the MT (assuming he's alive).  Then again being in the MT group means I have him target a lot of times irregardless of if he's actually tanking at the time.
__________________
_____________________________
Shailon - 70 - Inquisitor - Venekor
Shailen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2006, 05:49 AM   #25
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default

Well Here it is.  I was finally able to repoduce the effects of Verdicting myself.  See the large picture below because paint does a crap job resizing.I Forgot to mention it but if you look right below where it says Verdict was reflected is says...
                                                     "YOU HAVE BEEN BANISHED!"The effects of Verdict actually going off.  *note*  I was at Full HP before casting =)

Message Edited by ericshaitan on 08-22-2006 06:53 PM

__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2006, 06:31 AM   #26
Giem Boelcke

Lord
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
Default

[Removed for Content] that rocks!
Giem Boelcke is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2006, 12:26 PM   #27
Illaren

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 23
Default

lol kinda rude of him to tell u to your face you failed after dropping u to 1HP, he basically kicked u while u were down man!
Illaren is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2006, 03:31 PM   #28
Troysmith

Loremaster
Troysmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 90
Default

That is hilarious grats on being able to get it to happen again. Good thing you didn't have aggro. :smileyvery-happy:

__________________
Tigro 80 Brigand
Mayhem
Kagor 80 Inquisitor
Troysmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2006, 06:43 PM   #29
Ssinu

General
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 235
Default

Gnilllaw does this all the time - you don't have to be "late" you can be on time and you still get Verdict'd. But I haven't been able to verdict myself after Sentry Watch is used (that's what he uses to rescue himself). So not sure if the chance is just less or whatever.
__________________
Ssin'urn D'Ssinns // Inquisitor // Fires of Heaven
Ssinu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2006, 07:05 PM   #30
ericshaitan

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 259
Default


Ssinurn wrote:Gnilllaw does this all the time - you don't have to be "late" you can be on time and you still get Verdict'd. But I haven't been able to verdict myself after Sentry Watch is used (that's what he uses to rescue himself). So not sure if the chance is just less or whatever.

Ssin'urn,     Have you ever been able to verdict this guy?  Still wondering if its even possible.
__________________
ericshaitan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 PM.

vBulletin skin by: CompleteGFX.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All threads and posts originally from the EQ2 and Station forums operated by Sony Online Entertainment. Their use is by express written permission.