EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire

EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire (https://archive.eq2wire.com//index.php)
-   Ranger (https://archive.eq2wire.com//forumdisplay.php?f=102)
-   -   What is a good combat parser out there? (https://archive.eq2wire.com//showthread.php?t=199463)

Lukee 05-10-2006 01:08 AM

<DIV>I have 2 PCs on my network, so if it could be set up on the other PC, that would be even better.</DIV>

Jay 05-10-2006 01:28 AM

<A href="http://home.maine.rr.com/eqaditu/ACT/" target=_blank>Advanced Combat Tracker</A> is the parser du jour. Note that you need a current version of the .NET framework to run, IIRC.

Zholain 05-10-2006 01:44 AM

<font size="2">Indeed Advanced Combat Tracker is probably the best one out there right now.  Although it does seem to have it's problems.  A fellow ranger in my guild and myself both use ACT.  As best as we have been able to determine, we are using the exact same settings.  We can be standing right next to each other during a raid and get completely different results.  In fact, differences in the parses are more the norm than the exception.  And the differences in the parses didn't favor one player over another, meaning always showing him ahead or me ahead in dps.  I never parse anymore, and he very rarely does.If you want a better one, I'd recommend using your enjoyment level of the game.  That one is always perfect.   <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></font><div></div>

Jay 05-10-2006 01:46 AM

I <3 Catareina.

Prandtl 05-10-2006 01:48 AM

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Zholain wrote:<BR><FONT size=2>Indeed Advanced Combat Tracker is probably the best one out there right now.  Although it does seem to have it's problems.  A fellow ranger in my guild and myself both use ACT.  As best as we have been able to determine, we are using the exact same settings.  We can be standing right next to each other during a raid and get completely different results.  In fact, differences in the parses are more the norm than the exception.  And the differences in the parses didn't favor one player over another, meaning always showing him ahead or me ahead in dps.  I never parse anymore, and he very rarely does.<BR><BR>If you want a better one, I'd recommend using your enjoyment level of the game.  That one is always perfect.   <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /><BR></FONT> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR>Ya know, this is scary.  I was just thinking the exact same thing....  Was on a raid this weekend and three of us got completely different results from the same encounters, even though we were in close proximity</P> <P>I think the only real utility of a combat parser is for things like this past week, where quick shot was broken.  It gives a quick easy way to look at you logs and determine if something is not working.</P>

Zholain 05-10-2006 02:01 AM

<div><blockquote><hr><font size="2">Prandtl wrote:</font><p><font size="2">Ya know, this is scary.  I was just thinking the exact same thing....  </font></p><hr></blockquote><font size="2">Be careful with that.  Next thing you know you'll be merged onto Butcherblock catching glimpses of Kaeros in the new 'O' stance while wandering through Antonica.</font></div>

Jay 05-10-2006 02:02 AM

<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Zholain wrote:<BR> <DIV><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> <FONT size=2>Prandtl wrote:<BR></FONT> <P><FONT size=2>Ya know, this is scary.  I was just thinking the exact same thing....  </FONT></P><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><FONT size=2>Be careful with that.  Next thing you know you'll be merged onto Butcherblock catching glimpses of Kaeros in the new 'O' stance while wandering through Antonica.</FONT><BR></DIV><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P>BWAHAHAHAHAHAA</P> <P>If you saw me in the O-stance, it'd last a lot longer than a single glimpse, hon. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> </P> <P>/cackles, runs off</P>

Zholain 05-10-2006 02:03 AM

<font size="2">ROFLMAO  <span>:womanvery-happy:</span></font><div></div>

Prandtl 05-10-2006 02:19 AM

Not the dreaded "Kitty Stance" all the stray cats have been strutting about!

Kathas 05-10-2006 04:17 AM

I run ACT on a seperate computer and it works great.  My GF runs it on her game machine so we get to compare notes on the differences in the parse.  The conclusion we've come with to explain them has to do with the chat options and what is displayed in what window.  I have one window that is dedicated to combat messages and nothing else and she has her's closer to a default setting.  We think (dangerous I know) that any difference is due to the extra chat that the parser has to deal with.  My suggustion to anybody running mulltiple parses is to try to get the chat options to be the same and see what happens.By the way, for those of us running the Logitech G15 Gaming keyboard (with it's nifty LCD display), there is a thread on the ACT forums talking about trying to get a version of ACT's mini window to display on the LCD giving a real time DPS display.<div></div>

KnightOfTheWo 05-12-2006 10:43 PM

<div>I was about to say, don't get him started on the whole "O" stance thing...<span>:smileyvery-happy:</span><blockquote><hr>Zholain wrote:<div><blockquote><hr><font size="2">Prandtl wrote:</font><p><font size="2">Ya know, this is scary.  I was just thinking the exact same thing....  </font></p><hr></blockquote><font size="2">Be careful with that.  Next thing you know you'll be merged onto Butcherblock catching glimpses of Kaeros in the new 'O' stance while wandering through Antonica.</font></div><hr></blockquote></div>


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All threads and posts originally from the EQ2 and Station forums operated by Sony Online Entertainment. Their use is by express written permission.