|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#31 |
Active Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Is this it or more class changes to come ?.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]() 'None of the class balance changes will be going in until later next week.' was posted by Caith on Friday, 14 Oct. It is a week past the 'next week', however, beta schedules/dates should not be written in stone, so we will see. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
New Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
|
![]()
See my thread appropriately titled for my opinion on the troub jesters cap change ><
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
In regards to the inquisitor Deny skill change... it does less because it makes the mob itself lower the chance of bleedthru, which helps your whole raid. Templar's Reverence is one person, so obviously (to me.) it will do more. because it is less useful.
I thought about putting a ranty *****fest here about inquisitors and how they are still basically useless, but I wont, because clearly it doesn't matter anymore. Inquisitors, at this point, will always be the worst healers you can possibly invite to a group/raid. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Active Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Tried making a new thread regarding assassin's prestige conversions but its not getting much attention. What kind of prestige conversions is everyone seeing? Assassin's are Left Side 24cb.->1pot (whopping 125pot at cap) and Right Side is 24pot->1cb. Right side is the ideal conversion, but the only problem is that the right side is so terribly bad for any sort of situation where even the slightest amount of lag comes into play. Concealment is just bad and impossibly to even get a half of a FF chain off during raid lag so the vast majority of assassins (the whole two or three that are decent at least) use either Left Side or a dual spec.
My suggestion in the other thread was to either make both sides give the 24pot->1cb conversion, fix concealment and make it work like In Plain Sight, or scrap the penalty for using a dual prestige. Well, i logged in today and discovered they must've changed them overnight to be 12:1 ratios, but the desired conversion is still stuck on the right side |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Hrm....mage one is awkward
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
Well-Known Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
yea wizards are in a really good spot right now
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
If you gave Swashys the ability to convert their AoE abilities to single target with increased damage that would seem a pretty easy fix.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
i don't think that's even 100% necessary, right not saying swash can't raid is an unfair statement, will revelations take you? probably not but they're the most elitist well rounded group of players in the game with THE most serious raid schedule and entry requirements. I know plenty of swashy's that raid regularly, one our top dps in my current raid is a swashy, saying a rank 1 guild won't take you so nobody will is a bit of an overstatement. Anything that can put swash single target dps on par with a brig would be more than sufficient, the aoe to single target conversion would likely solve that, or maybe try doing some changes to the right side prestige tree to make the damage more desireable. But a swash or a brig by design should never beat a sin, or a beastlord, swash and brig are and always will be the debuff scout, with respectable damage, yeah swash single target is less than respectable atm, the best idea out there that isn't entirely unreasonable is the aoe to single target conversion with 100% damage, to give swash their aoe dominance, and a 100% single target CA damage buff is a little bit too op SOUNDING (key word) it could work out well that way as the swash single target is miserable.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
That being said about the swash, the paladin seems to have been kinda stuck right where it's been since zerks rose to power, I wouldn't mind seeing a few more defensive buffs to the pally as they seem to be the squishiest of the 4 plate tanks ever since their heal crits were taken away. nothing major even, the SK has a buff that adds a damage reduction to Crusaders faith, and i feel a similar effect should be added to the paladin to make up for the difference in defensive abilities between the 4 plate tanks,or maybe increase the damage reduction bonus on marrs favor by another 5% or 10%. the increased hp may play out well, but i still feel like paladins are running behind again. i really miss being able to main tank on my paladin, and it seems very few people are willing to let us do that due to our defensive inferiority.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Here a suggestion about the Inquisitor class balance : - Remove the health threshold on Prepared Defenses. ![]() This small fix would give the inquistor a way to ALWAYS trigger a ward on his groupmates following the use of Interrogation. ( recast = 22.5s ) That would not be overpowered considering shaman's current healing power and/or bleeding damages into wards. |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
Well-Known Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
(cross-posting from a different thread)
From an assassin's standpoint, I would like to see the following changes: 1. Increase the duration of concealment and IPS from 7 to 10 seconds to account for raid lag. 2. Increase the replicated damage of Shadow from 30% to 40-50% w/ the same duration (the ranger version of this ability is currently superior because of ethereal onslaught + aura of immolation). 3. Allow dumbfire pets in general to automatically switch to other encounter members if the primary target is killed before the spell expires naturally. 4. Modify dexterous attacks (heroic alternate advancement) to instead increase the base damage (before other modifiers) of affected abilities by 100%. 5. Add mortal blade to the list of abilities affected by dexterous attacks - the base damage of this ability is currently too low for its recast time. 6. Add a significant amount of combat art double attack to KA equipment - if you want scouts to gear like mages, make us fight like them. 7. Improve the base damage of Exemplar's Caustic Poison / Hemotoxin / Vitality Breach -- this change would be beneficial for both rogues and predators. I want it to be one of the top 3-5 abilities in my ACT breakdown at all times. |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
Active Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]() mostly good suggestions, but doubt much of it will happen. #1 would be a great start without giving a direct boost, or change concealment to work just like IPS and give IPS another bonus. #7 would be nice, or allow them to cit like weapon procs |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
Active Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Any thing else inbound with the class rebalancing or is this what it's going to be for the new expac ? Its a great looking expac let's not stuff it with half thought out class changes and a bad loot table / progression....
|
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
Active Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
|
![]() "I have good news and bad news. They posted some |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
You're always relevant Larc, you're the eye candy.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
yeah as far as balancing goes....i think they most definitely did not do any actual balancing, more like "lets tip the scales super hard towards the wizzy and make everyone else generally dissatisfied" but who knows, they might add more down the road, this is still just beta and all is subject to change.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Active Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]() I'm not sure why you think Wizards have come out on top here, because they have 5 lines of updates? Lets have a look at these changes. So for you that think Wizards are going to be in some great place I beg to differ, Yes is a boost but a much need boost |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Well-Known Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
|
![]()
K just sitting here trying to follow the logic path from the dev staff on their patch fix (Deny/Reverance for clerics reducing varrible % amounts of Bleedthrough) to their other poorly thought out "balance" fix aka Bleedthrough. While I am glad to finally see some class changes on beta this was in no way what was expected or needed....as Larc said comicly...your essentially giving clerics (btw where are the other non shaman healer changes with regards to bleedthrough so that they too can feel the love) an ability to reduce the poorly thoughtout Bleedthrough mechanic incoming on one or more players which in essence reduces the need for our non shaman heals...granted this example is an overly simplified description but lets be honest this xpac is bringing resolve and bleedthrough on a buckwild extent which means even less flexibility for healers, less margin for error on our part (ohh joy) and not much left to compensate. Your not really giving clerics let alone all non shaman heals much to work with.
TBH after seeing the selective buff to JCAP...I say selective because lets face it limiting it's new buff to only 4 classes on top of the pseudo fix to clerics ( though I pray other changes are coming...changes that actually had the healer community's imput) I'm not sure if the dev team believes a more open and well rounded set of class changes is warranted...which imo makes about as much sense as a screendoor on a submarine. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
Well-Known Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Why was my comment deleted?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Rather then treating symptoms maybe the devs could addess the source of the healer class problem, and that is the massive increase in heal output relative to tank max HP. Because a healer can take a tank from 1% to max in one cast, mob damage had to increase. Well it's given us the situation where a tank without either a ward or a healer chain-casting his heals is a dead tank. Wards were the shaman specialty, why should druids and clerics require them?
If they were to scale back the value on heals, they could then scale back the mob damage output. Maybe we could go back to the days when a healer could be stunned or stifled for 6 seconds and not cause a party wipe. That's my view of it, I'm curious what other healers see as the root of the problem. |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Well-Known Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 0
|
![]() Right now, the only healers who's heals actually benefit from the massive potency numbers are shaman.. because wards in excess of max hitpoints are useful.. reactives, hots and direct heals inexcess of max hitpoints are completely and utterly useless. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
#allow Jcap ferv on other DPS classes?
-Bl's & Summoners/Rogues |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
Active Member
Join Date: Jan 1970
Posts: 3
|
![]()
As a shaman, I don't mind the bleed through mechanic. So far in the fights I have seen, they are using it in interesting ways tied to scripts, and it adds another element to the fight to do things to avoid the extra bleed through. Hopefully I will still feel the same once we lose the beta buffs and are on our own with it.
However, I don't think introducing bleed through has done anything to address the major class balance concerns of druids and clerics. I like the idea of increasing the hit point to damage ratio so that regular auto attack does not one shot players. One shots are fine for script fails, which shaman can't ward through either. I don't want to return to the tov days when hit points were huge compared to wards and the wards would fail the second they were applied, but hopefully there can be a balancing point where players can survive long enough for druids and clerics to heal the damage from auto attacks, and wards still remain effective. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
made a separate thread but I'll post here too
anyone else confirm ? Some testing on a necro from new Upbeat Changes Original Dot (no AA's /dbl cast/buffs) 4 - ticks Original Dot + Accelerated Decay (Adds 2 ticks) 6 - ticks (correct) Original Dot + Accelerated Decay + Upbeat Tempo (with new 3 tick tooltip) 8- Ticks (missing a tick) Original Dot + Accelerated Decay + Upbeat + Ancient Fury (Adds 2 but Doesnt stack with UT/TC) 8 - Ticks (Correct if not stacking and overriding UT) ****Can we get a look at this? I enjoy the idea that we are getting another dot tick out of UT but it needs to stack correctly. Also I think it is time we remove or bring that dragon tree in line with the new UT changes so we aren't effectively gimping an AA tree due to having a class present. It was equal, let's keep it that way or change the ability. |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
New Member
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
UT and ancient Fury never stacked. Allowing them to stack now with the new UT buff would probably make the dot classes a lil bit OP.
|
![]() |