|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#61 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 106
|
![]() Forum mods in the inqui forums... it's not a good day for us... I'm going to try to get this back on track with another observation. The fixed reactive bonus of +40 or whatever does not scale with Spell quality and healing adornments as the Templar version does. Here's some numbers: master 1 avg The difference in the bonus is bad, but the kicker is that their's gets even better with higher quality spells, while ours stays insignificant. Templar bonus goes from about 7 times better than ours at adept 1 to as much as 10 times better at master 1 with a few adornments. I realize the value of having higher per-reactive heals, but seriously this needs to be adjusted some - and preferrably not by a static number. Let's say leave the templar bonus in and adjust inquisitors to each proc of the reactive is +40% or something like that. Templar's reactives would still go much further (twice as far, in fact) in the long run, but they could time-out, too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 371
|
![]()
I believe the templar set may have been nerfed to, two extra reactives but I havent been able to get a recent look at the gear so if anyone has any information that would help.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 47
|
![]() I believe the 2 extra reactives was early beta - apparently that wasn't good enough. The live links and pics I'm seeing now are 4 triggers lol.
__________________
Disgust - 70 Inquisitor of Kithicor Uraa - 70 Coercer of Nektulos |
![]() |
![]() |