GU 51 and PvP - Page 21

Rhodan · 04-06-2009, 11:37 AM

Faenril@Nagafen wrote:

Rhodan@Nagafen wrote:
[...] and heard people suggest decay without any negative feedback to the suggestion [...]
mmh did you read the 39 previous pages ?

Nope, I would be reading this entire thread for weeks if I did, and I don't have the patience to do so, but all I heard was complaints about the new fame system by looking back at a few other posts. I just wrote what I thought about the new fame system and what i thought about people complaining about it.

Faenril · 04-06-2009, 11:53 AM

Rhodan@Nagafen wrote:

Faenril@Nagafen wrote:
Rhodan@Nagafen wrote:
[...] and heard people suggest decay without any negative feedback to the suggestion [...]
mmh did you read the 39 previous pages ?
Nope, I would be reading this entire thread for weeks if I did, and I don't have the patience to do so, but all I heard was complaints about the new fame system by looking back at a few other posts. I just wrote what I thought about the new fame system and what i thought about people complaining about it.

Well if you had read this thread or any older thread mentionning fame decay, you would have noticed ppl gave complaints and warnings about potential drawbacks / side effects / exploits and what not.

But it's ok mate, even devs do not read them or deliberatly ignore them, so why would you bother really ? SMILEY

Darkor · 04-06-2009, 12:59 PM

Cyst@Venekor wrote:

Darkor@Venekor wrote:
I cant help it but the new changes to pvp are a disaster.
Yeah, more PvP on a PvP server is a disaster. Who would have thought.
We know you're losing fame, who cares, seriously? Your title meant nothing. Now you don't have to duel on the BBM docks, instead you can now go out and /gasp PvP in the wild. Just pick new targets after you die.
If you really want risk, carry 10 plat every time you go out to PvP.

Mindless zerging on a pvp server. Only Demron could have called it pvp... Im not surprised.

Cyst · 04-06-2009, 05:16 PM

Darkor@Venekor wrote:

Cyst@Venekor wrote:
Darkor@Venekor wrote:
I cant help it but the new changes to pvp are a disaster.
Yeah, more PvP on a PvP server is a disaster. Who would have thought.
We know you're losing fame, who cares, seriously? Your title meant nothing. Now you don't have to duel on the BBM docks, instead you can now go out and /gasp PvP in the wild. Just pick new targets after you die.
If you really want risk, carry 10 plat every time you go out to PvP.
Mindless zerging on a pvp server. Only Demron could have called it pvp... Im not surprised.

I don't get zerged often, and I do not zerg ever. You're the one running back to fight Asmodai again, after he beat you. Check your accusations, and realize you do the very things you say you dislike. I mean you charged our group four times, and died all four times. If THAT isn't PvP for you, then why do you do it?

I on the other hand will not go back when I lose, unless that person invites me to. But I don't lose often.

Oh, and there is far less zerging after the LU, then before the LU, but you should know the changes that went in to cause much less zerging.

Desna · 04-11-2009, 09:37 AM

Can anyone give a solid discussion on the PvP updates in GU51 without mixing it up with Lavastorm?

Does anyone remember Frostfell and the button-mash fest it was? Or Loping Plains when Halloween came out? Or Moors when TSO released? All of these zones right at release saw a large influx of PvP. The Lavastorm AE-fest has NOTHING to do with the current PvP changes. So please people, stop bringing it up.

I like the general idea of the new update. No zerging=win! And it's refreshing to see people actually making an attempt at keeping their titles vs immune camping. PvP is what you make it...if you want more risk, start carrying plat on you. The offline decay needs a finetune, and IMO should be "all kills stave off fame decay, but only equal or above titles actually cause title increases".

Armironhead · 04-13-2009, 10:18 AM

Desna_Venekor wrote:

Can anyone give a solid discussion on the PvP updates in GU51 without mixing it up with Lavastorm?
Does anyone remember Frostfell and the button-mash fest it was? Or Loping Plains when Halloween came out? Or Moors when TSO released? All of these zones right at release saw a large influx of PvP. The Lavastorm AE-fest has NOTHING to do with the current PvP changes. So please people, stop bringing it up.
I like the general idea of the new update. No zerging=win! And it's refreshing to see people actually making an attempt at keeping their titles vs immune camping. PvP is what you make it...if you want more risk, start carrying plat on you. The offline decay needs a finetune, and IMO should be "all kills stave off fame decay, but only equal or above titles actually cause title increases".

Is it true that fame decay only happens if you are logged out; that if you stay perma logged in (like all those folk parked on the nek docks) you dont decay?

Dorsan · 04-14-2009, 02:19 AM

This is ridiculous. T2 = everyone is a slayer+. T3 = everyone is a destroyer+, T4 = everyone is a champ+. T8 = everyone is a general+. Except for the twinked alts that can kill everyone in low tiers. They are untitled now. xD

Desna · 04-14-2009, 04:28 PM

Armironhead@Vox wrote:

Desna_Venekor wrote:
Can anyone give a solid discussion on the PvP updates in GU51 without mixing it up with Lavastorm?
Does anyone remember Frostfell and the button-mash fest it was? Or Loping Plains when Halloween came out? Or Moors when TSO released? All of these zones right at release saw a large influx of PvP. The Lavastorm AE-fest has NOTHING to do with the current PvP changes. So please people, stop bringing it up.
I like the general idea of the new update. No zerging=win! And it's refreshing to see people actually making an attempt at keeping their titles vs immune camping. PvP is what you make it...if you want more risk, start carrying plat on you. The offline decay needs a finetune, and IMO should be "all kills stave off fame decay, but only equal or above titles actually cause title increases".
Is it true that fame decay only happens if you are logged out; that if you stay perma logged in (like all those folk parked on the nek docks) you dont decay?

Lol, it's starting to look like it. I was skeptical about it til people in my guild started trying it...no one's lost a title yet. So apparently, if you never log off, you keep your title. A bit messed up really (and kinda curses me with my 7 alts, I switch on to one for an hour and I decay).

Azekah1 · 04-14-2009, 04:39 PM

If another person says carry plat on you for risk I swear to God!

04-06-2009, 11:37 AM	#601
Rhodan Server: Nagafen Loremaster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 223	Faenril@Nagafen wrote: Rhodan@Nagafen wrote: [...] and heard people suggest decay without any negative feedback to the suggestion [...] mmh did you read the 39 previous pages ? Nope, I would be reading this entire thread for weeks if I did, and I don't have the patience to do so, but all I heard was complaints about the new fame system by looking back at a few other posts. I just wrote what I thought about the new fame system and what i thought about people complaining about it.

04-06-2009, 11:53 AM	#602
Faenril Server: Nagafen Guild: Purity Rank: Sushi Maker - Alt Loremaster Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 2,136	Rhodan@Nagafen wrote: Faenril@Nagafen wrote: Rhodan@Nagafen wrote: [...] and heard people suggest decay without any negative feedback to the suggestion [...] mmh did you read the 39 previous pages ? Nope, I would be reading this entire thread for weeks if I did, and I don't have the patience to do so, but all I heard was complaints about the new fame system by looking back at a few other posts. I just wrote what I thought about the new fame system and what i thought about people complaining about it. Well if you had read this thread or any older thread mentionning fame decay, you would have noticed ppl gave complaints and warnings about potential drawbacks / side effects / exploits and what not. But it's ok mate, even devs do not read them or deliberatly ignore them, so why would you bother really ?

04-06-2009, 12:59 PM	#603
Darkor Server: Nagafen Guild: Nexus Rank: Ancient and Mummified Loremaster Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Germany Posts: 1,957	Cyst@Venekor wrote: Darkor@Venekor wrote: I cant help it but the new changes to pvp are a disaster. Yeah, more PvP on a PvP server is a disaster. Who would have thought. We know you're losing fame, who cares, seriously? Your title meant nothing. Now you don't have to duel on the BBM docks, instead you can now go out and /gasp PvP in the wild. Just pick new targets after you die. If you really want risk, carry 10 plat every time you go out to PvP. Mindless zerging on a pvp server. Only Demron could have called it pvp... Im not surprised. __________________ Steal 90 Assassin Darkor 90 Swashbuckler Daerkin 90 Shadowknight Daerkor 90 Templar Ajjantis 90 Warden Melodic 90 Dirge Dayo 90 Monk Rasiel 88 Conjuror Razyeel 70 Wizard Biyon 65 Beastlord

04-06-2009, 05:16 PM	#604
Cyst Server: Venekor Guild: Circle of Storms Rank: Officer Alt (Raid Capable) Loremaster Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,609	Darkor@Venekor wrote: Cyst@Venekor wrote: Darkor@Venekor wrote: I cant help it but the new changes to pvp are a disaster. Yeah, more PvP on a PvP server is a disaster. Who would have thought. We know you're losing fame, who cares, seriously? Your title meant nothing. Now you don't have to duel on the BBM docks, instead you can now go out and /gasp PvP in the wild. Just pick new targets after you die. If you really want risk, carry 10 plat every time you go out to PvP. Mindless zerging on a pvp server. Only Demron could have called it pvp... Im not surprised. I don't get zerged often, and I do not zerg ever. You're the one running back to fight Asmodai again, after he beat you. Check your accusations, and realize you do the very things you say you dislike. I mean you charged our group four times, and died all four times. If THAT isn't PvP for you, then why do you do it? I on the other hand will not go back when I lose, unless that person invites me to. But I don't lose often. Oh, and there is far less zerging after the LU, then before the LU, but you should know the changes that went in to cause much less zerging.

04-13-2009, 10:18 AM	#606
Armironhead Server: Vox Loremaster Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 1,194	Desna_Venekor wrote: Can anyone give a solid discussion on the PvP updates in GU51 without mixing it up with Lavastorm? Does anyone remember Frostfell and the button-mash fest it was? Or Loping Plains when Halloween came out? Or Moors when TSO released? All of these zones right at release saw a large influx of PvP. The Lavastorm AE-fest has NOTHING to do with the current PvP changes. So please people, stop bringing it up. I like the general idea of the new update. No zerging=win! And it's refreshing to see people actually making an attempt at keeping their titles vs immune camping. PvP is what you make it...if you want more risk, start carrying plat on you. The offline decay needs a finetune, and IMO should be "all kills stave off fame decay, but only equal or above titles actually cause title increases". Is it true that fame decay only happens if you are logged out; that if you stay perma logged in (like all those folk parked on the nek docks) you dont decay? __________________

04-11-2009, 09:37 AM	#605
Desna Server: Antonia Bayle Guild: Veeshans Fury Rank: Vegeta Cheerleading squad -Recruit Loremaster Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 256	Can anyone give a solid discussion on the PvP updates in GU51 without mixing it up with Lavastorm? Does anyone remember Frostfell and the button-mash fest it was? Or Loping Plains when Halloween came out? Or Moors when TSO released? All of these zones right at release saw a large influx of PvP. The Lavastorm AE-fest has NOTHING to do with the current PvP changes. So please people, stop bringing it up. I like the general idea of the new update. No zerging=win! And it's refreshing to see people actually making an attempt at keeping their titles vs immune camping. PvP is what you make it...if you want more risk, start carrying plat on you. The offline decay needs a finetune, and IMO should be "all kills stave off fame decay, but only equal or above titles actually cause title increases".

04-14-2009, 02:19 AM	#607
Dorsan Server: Nagafen Guild: Onyx Rank: Member Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 971	This is ridiculous. T2 = everyone is a slayer+. T3 = everyone is a destroyer+, T4 = everyone is a champ+. T8 = everyone is a general+. Except for the twinked alts that can kill everyone in low tiers. They are untitled now. xD __________________

04-14-2009, 04:28 PM	#608
Desna Server: Antonia Bayle Guild: Veeshans Fury Rank: Vegeta Cheerleading squad -Recruit Loremaster Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 256	Armironhead@Vox wrote: Desna_Venekor wrote: Can anyone give a solid discussion on the PvP updates in GU51 without mixing it up with Lavastorm? Does anyone remember Frostfell and the button-mash fest it was? Or Loping Plains when Halloween came out? Or Moors when TSO released? All of these zones right at release saw a large influx of PvP. The Lavastorm AE-fest has NOTHING to do with the current PvP changes. So please people, stop bringing it up. I like the general idea of the new update. No zerging=win! And it's refreshing to see people actually making an attempt at keeping their titles vs immune camping. PvP is what you make it...if you want more risk, start carrying plat on you. The offline decay needs a finetune, and IMO should be "all kills stave off fame decay, but only equal or above titles actually cause title increases". Is it true that fame decay only happens if you are logged out; that if you stay perma logged in (like all those folk parked on the nek docks) you dont decay? Lol, it's starting to look like it. I was skeptical about it til people in my guild started trying it...no one's lost a title yet. So apparently, if you never log off, you keep your title. A bit messed up really (and kinda curses me with my 7 alts, I switch on to one for an hour and I decay).

04-14-2009, 04:39 PM	#609
Azekah1 Loremaster Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 1,887	If another person says carry plat on you for risk I swear to God!