|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,984
|
![]() Is there any chance of new tier writs for 91-92?
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Lord
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 452
|
![]() I thought I read the answer to this somewhere. Stupid question, but did you check the traders website to see if it was mentioned there? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,984
|
![]() I read, but didn't see anything, but will check again!
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Server: Lucan DLere
Guild: Fourth Wall
Rank: Emperor
Loremaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,302
|
![]() All the talk about new writs in the testing forum was about how there were none, so I believe the answer is 'no'. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lord
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 452
|
![]() We want writs! We want writs! LOL.. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Server: Lucan DLere
Guild: Fourth Wall
Rank: Emperor
Loremaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,302
|
![]() Aside from a little more status, what's the point? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 852
|
![]() Deveryn@Crushbone wrote:
That's not enough of one for you? But also to level to 92 and eventually beyond. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Server: Lucan DLere
Guild: Fourth Wall
Rank: Emperor
Loremaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,302
|
![]() Mermut wrote:
We can worry about going beyond when they decide to finish this tier. That will probably be later this year or next year. In the meantime, there's no urgent need. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 852
|
![]() Given the buggy nature of the tradeskill content they did add... the sooner they start working on what should be basic stuff the better.. or we're likely not to get it in a workable condition, if at all. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Lord
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 452
|
![]() Why is having the next tier of writs important to me? Because I can use the status. My guild of 2 is almost 50 and I was hoping with the new tier of writs I'd be able to get the last 25% that I need. Quicker. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Server: Antonia Bayle
Guild: Dynasty Reborn
Rank: Member w/ 10000 + status pts
Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 99
|
![]() T89 writs. T92 writs. Not much difference and about the same level gap as has always been in the writ system. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Server: Lucan DLere
Guild: Fourth Wall
Rank: Emperor
Loremaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,302
|
![]() shots01 wrote:
I have a tiny guild as well (level 45), so I can sympathize a little. The difference between the 89 writ at 90 and 92 is 1000 status (100 for the guild). The average guild is unaffected. Even if they did add writs,that would only be around 20k per writ. At these levels, you're still crawling. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Server: Storms
Guild: Les Furies d Innoruuk
Rank: Matriarches
Tester
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: France (Storms)
Posts: 3,161
|
![]() Keratis@Antonia Bayle wrote:
Not much? Well, the "not much" is loosing 1000 sp per writ at level 92. At each level above the writ level, you loose a bit more status, that's roughly a 1000 drop in that case. On 18700 sp at 90, a 1000 drop is a big drop. I level my guild and pay my rent on the hall solely on trdeskill writs and loosing a big chunk of SP is always a bad thing. Plus: what's the point of harvesting T10 if you can't use the mats in writs? (yeah yeah, crafting consummables, but still) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Server: Lucan DLere
Guild: Fourth Wall
Rank: Emperor
Loremaster
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,302
|
![]() I'm curious to see what will happen next, with the way the provisioner recipes work now. Since they use more components per combine, it creates an imbalance that they have to fix in the way orders are handled. Maybe we'll get writs with generic recipes. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Tester
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 7,842
|
![]() Deveryn@Crushbone wrote:
They use more components but produce more per combine. A full stack or more at 4 bars completed. |
![]() |
![]() |