Ok I need help picking a healer to stick with.

Suraklin · 11-26-2009, 05:21 PM

I have three healers at the moment all pretty much the same level. At the moment I like them all. I need to know which is going to be best to stick with for later in the game in terms of getting a group easy. I have a Warden, Mystic, and Inquisitor at the moment all in the low 30's. I deleted my fury for the time being.

I need to know from experienced high level players which of the three priest I have would be snapped up quickly if a healer was needed? My wife has a lvl 80 Mystic and seems to have a tough time getting a group on Mistmoore server. Which of the three solo the best at high level also when I don't have a lot of time for grouping?

Tehom · 11-26-2009, 07:12 PM

Mystic and inquisitor would both be pretty close, I think. They solo about equivalently and are about the same in group desirability. I'd probably give a bit of an edge to a mystic earlier on, since inquisitors have their capabilities expanded by gear to a greater degree, but I think it's pretty close. It'll mostly depend on whether clerics or shamans are more common on your server.

woolf2k · 02-12-2010, 06:00 PM

Chath@Antonia Bayle wrote:

Mystic and inquisitor would both be pretty close, I think. They solo about equivalently and are about the same in group desirability. I'd probably give a bit of an edge to a mystic earlier on, since inquisitors have their capabilities expanded by gear to a greater degree, but I think it's pretty close. It'll mostly depend on whether clerics or shamans are more common on your server.

QFE

Jemoo · 02-13-2010, 05:40 AM

From my experience, mystics are really good for solo healing at lower levels, until you get AAs and gear, and are more desirable in group settings to solo heal at end game (right with a templar). I am slightly bias playing a mystic on a sever with low defiler and inquisitor populations though. Both the mystic and inquisitor will be wanted in raids, if that's what you like doing. The warden would be wanted over a fury but either are getting in only if there are no more shamans and clerics who want to go along. That doesn't include player skill of course, a good fury will be wanted over a crap cleric or shaman by most people I know. What ever you pick, learn it well. Read up, work on your own, duo things you shouldn't be able to, get your name out there as a good healer. That's how you'll be wanted.

StaticLex · 02-16-2010, 06:09 AM

Suraklin wrote:

I need to know which is going to be best to stick with for later in the game in terms of getting a group easy.

The one you play the best.

11-26-2009, 05:21 PM	#1
Suraklin Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 350	I have three healers at the moment all pretty much the same level. At the moment I like them all. I need to know which is going to be best to stick with for later in the game in terms of getting a group easy. I have a Warden, Mystic, and Inquisitor at the moment all in the low 30's. I deleted my fury for the time being. I need to know from experienced high level players which of the three priest I have would be snapped up quickly if a healer was needed? My wife has a lvl 80 Mystic and seems to have a tough time getting a group on Mistmoore server. Which of the three solo the best at high level also when I don't have a lot of time for grouping? __________________ Relax...it's just an update for the patch to fix the nerf that nerfed the fix for the update of the patch that broke the fix that was fixed on the previous nerf they called an update... Friends don't let friends ask for another classes nerf.

02-12-2010, 06:00 PM	#3
woolf2k Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 845	Chath@Antonia Bayle wrote: Mystic and inquisitor would both be pretty close, I think. They solo about equivalently and are about the same in group desirability. I'd probably give a bit of an edge to a mystic earlier on, since inquisitors have their capabilities expanded by gear to a greater degree, but I think it's pretty close. It'll mostly depend on whether clerics or shamans are more common on your server. QFE

02-13-2010, 05:40 AM	#4
Jemoo Server: Kithicor Guild: Faydarks Legion Rank: Guild Officers Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 204	From my experience, mystics are really good for solo healing at lower levels, until you get AAs and gear, and are more desirable in group settings to solo heal at end game (right with a templar). I am slightly bias playing a mystic on a sever with low defiler and inquisitor populations though. Both the mystic and inquisitor will be wanted in raids, if that's what you like doing. The warden would be wanted over a fury but either are getting in only if there are no more shamans and clerics who want to go along. That doesn't include player skill of course, a good fury will be wanted over a crap cleric or shaman by most people I know. What ever you pick, learn it well. Read up, work on your own, duo things you shouldn't be able to, get your name out there as a good healer. That's how you'll be wanted. __________________

02-16-2010, 06:09 AM	#5
StaticLex Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: USA Posts: 1,230	Suraklin wrote: I need to know which is going to be best to stick with for later in the game in terms of getting a group easy. The one you play the best. __________________ When you've played this game for ten years and gone to bat seven-thousand times and gotten two-thousand hits do you know what that really means? It means you've gone zero for five-thousand. --- Reggie Jackson

11-26-2009, 07:12 PM	#2
Tehom Loremaster Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,171	Mystic and inquisitor would both be pretty close, I think. They solo about equivalently and are about the same in group desirability. I'd probably give a bit of an edge to a mystic earlier on, since inquisitors have their capabilities expanded by gear to a greater degree, but I think it's pretty close. It'll mostly depend on whether clerics or shamans are more common on your server.