View Single Post
Unread 04-08-2010, 07:08 PM   #21
Venez
Server: Unrest
Guild: Vendetta
Rank: Member

Loremaster
Venez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 112
Default

Snosael wrote:

some of you seem to be missing the point.  why should rangers be taxed so heavily for dps?  also, 'situational' should not eliminate rangers who dont / cant raid.  they have "situations" as well. 

while every other class that can use a bow may be able to justify filling a quiver with these arrows, the cost imposed on rangers is REDICULOUS!  especially when we are NOT T1 dps and when all other T1 dps classes DO NOT have to pay this kind of coin to do their dps!!

Oh I do agree that it sucks haveing to pay to play. We didnt complain nearly as much about it back when we were T1 DPS with Assassins and Wizards, but now adays when there are class's that are doing 25% more dps on a consistant basis, it just is another slap in the mouth.

There are now class's that were never intended to be T1 DPS due to there buff and debuff ablities, during the many dev and managment changes, someone had a brilliant idea to bring the buff / debuff class up to T1 dps ablilities to make them more desirable (even tho you already had 2+ in raids) They then decided to nerf Rangers because we "hit" to "hard" and could stand back with the casters.........but then they boosted the casters as well.............NICE !! SoE Failure 100%

__________________
a href='http://eq2players.station.sony.com/characters/character_profile.vm?characterId=937242202'>
Venez is offline   Reply With Quote