EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post - Scaling instances: Small groups, duos and 2-boxers getting the short end of the stick?

Flotten · 11-30-2008, 02:01 PM

Soluss2 wrote:

Flotten wrote:
Full_Metal_Mage wrote:
Exactly, but some people do because they need to be "hand held". Lets look at real life, lets take hunting... I can go hunting with 2 friends (group of 3) and bag the SAME size deer as a group of 24 (raid). I love how people think that just because they stand around with 23 other people they are somehow entitled to more. Its just plain lazy and selfishness.
People should be rewarded by the time and effort, not how many people they are with. And please dont give me that crap about how difficult it is to organize 24 people, it isnt difficult at all. The only person who will have a hard time is the LEADER who is trying to coordinate a bunch of idiots who dont pay attention and are just there to loot a corpse after each battle.
But if you do subscribe to the false theory that grouping is somehow hard and difficult, then I would assme that someone who six boxes has even more difficulty... so should he get more or better loot?
Note: I dont multi-box
Raiders spend hours upon hours upon days/weeks/months making sure 23 other people get everything they want to.

Another dreamer. Sorry, raiding is not harder. Running six boxes would be more difficult.

I probably spend more time in the game than any raider, if you think time matters then im entitled to a lot more loot.

11-30-2008, 02:01 PM	#251
Flotten Loremaster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 68	Soluss2 wrote: Flotten wrote: Full_Metal_Mage wrote: Exactly, but some people do because they need to be "hand held". Lets look at real life, lets take hunting... I can go hunting with 2 friends (group of 3) and bag the SAME size deer as a group of 24 (raid). I love how people think that just because they stand around with 23 other people they are somehow entitled to more. Its just plain lazy and selfishness. People should be rewarded by the time and effort, not how many people they are with. And please dont give me that crap about how difficult it is to organize 24 people, it isnt difficult at all. The only person who will have a hard time is the LEADER who is trying to coordinate a bunch of idiots who dont pay attention and are just there to loot a corpse after each battle. But if you do subscribe to the false theory that grouping is somehow hard and difficult, then I would assme that someone who six boxes has even more difficulty... so should he get more or better loot? Note: I dont multi-box Raiders spend hours upon hours upon days/weeks/months making sure 23 other people get everything they want to. Another dreamer. Sorry, raiding is not harder. Running six boxes would be more difficult. I probably spend more time in the game than any raider, if you think time matters then im entitled to a lot more loot.