View Single Post
Unread 04-22-2008, 06:15 PM   #23
Nimbrithil

Loremaster
Nimbrithil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 321
Default

Blackoath@Kithicor wrote:

I personaly don't support SK getting Dual wield, BUT 2h needs a major upgrade in both damage and stats.  Plus our spells/CA could use upgrades also!

I also think they need to do some major balancing on our abilities vs the warriors DA, our MT guardian is hitting 86pct DA with his AA's and guess what he didn't lose a bit of avoidance when he changed his AA's once he got his fabled buckler, in fact he gained avoidance and he hasn't even gotten his mythical yet.  Some reason that just ticks me off alot!

To be blunt we should out dps Guardians by alot.

Sorry for slight derail, no to dual wield, but upgrade 2handers!

I agree,,,no to Dual wield. Look at it from the "LORE" perspective. The Crusader class is the knight of EQ2. They should be wielding huge two handed weapons that do devastating damage and this USED TO BE the case before the change in dual wield to 1 hander to two hander. The weps need upgraded and maybe the spells,,,not sure I have only played my SK thorugh 14 levels and he is level locked for PVP. At lower levels as I am now the SK is BRUTAL though.
__________________
Master Sage Burp 80 Conji/80 Sage/80 tranmuter=240 levels of poofda

Master Armourer Bubb 32 Zerk/80 Armorer faction

Twinkerhell 80 Shadowknight on Q side

Fupu 66 conji/80 Provi

Lreeza 51 monk/80 Weaponsmith

Knave 51 Ranger/68 Woodworker

Oscarm 80 Defiler/80 Alchy/80 tinker

Lyrilanon 80 Carpenter
Nimbrithil is offline   Reply With Quote