EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post

Gladiia · 02-05-2008, 07:42 PM

Banedon@Antonia Bayle wrote:

Gladiia@The Bazaar wrote:
Kel wrote:
Grimwell wrote:
A few things to remember in the chaos here folks:
The "French Rep" did post bad information about the 29th which I did refute.
The "French Rep" also posted about the 5th in an attempt to correct the information about the 29th. This was incorrect, and that is why it's no longer something you can link to.
I don't know about you, Grim- but beyond the first time I link something, I don't typically go back to relink it over and over again. Especially when it's in a foreign language. Perhaps something TELLING us it was incorrect information, since the information was provided by one of your employees would be a good idea in the future?
You're kidding right? With a link to the statement made a week ago, a removal of the bad info, and a followup today from grim again, you still say that we weren't told it was bad info?
Read Grim's post again. He refuted the Jan 29th info. The 5th Feb info was only removed today and was never refuted.No we're not kidding

The false statement regarding the update being today was made before january 29th.

02-05-2008, 07:42 PM	#91
Gladiia Server: The Bazaar Guild: Driven Rank: Regent Seer Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,234	Banedon@Antonia Bayle wrote: Gladiia@The Bazaar wrote: Kel wrote: Grimwell wrote: A few things to remember in the chaos here folks: The "French Rep" did post bad information about the 29th which I did refute. The "French Rep" also posted about the 5th in an attempt to correct the information about the 29th. This was incorrect, and that is why it's no longer something you can link to. I don't know about you, Grim- but beyond the first time I link something, I don't typically go back to relink it over and over again. Especially when it's in a foreign language. Perhaps something TELLING us it was incorrect information, since the information was provided by one of your employees would be a good idea in the future? You're kidding right? With a link to the statement made a week ago, a removal of the bad info, and a followup today from grim again, you still say that we weren't told it was bad info? Read Grim's post again. He refuted the Jan 29th info. The 5th Feb info was only removed today and was never refuted.No we're not kidding The false statement regarding the update being today was made before january 29th.