TrentKillcult wrote:
WaachBack wrote:
Coming from someone who plays both a 70 bruiser and monk, I would have to say this is a great change. My bruiser always felt more powerfull then my monk and even after the change, I would still pick my bruiser over my monk. I love them both and they are very alike. This was a good change that brought both classes a little closer ability wise.
When you say more powerful you should claify how it feels more powerful. Because it can solo better? More damage? Better stuns? More stuns? Higher CA damage?
Also since when is bringing classes closer together ability wise a good thing. They are different classes for a reason, they should be DIFFERENT. Why don't we all just have a scout/tank/mage/healer class and then everyone can have the exact same skills and abilities, sounds good to me! not...
Sorry, I'm a little testy since I'm losing 7.5 seconds worth of stuns and getting a daze that i'm not sure if i'm even going to be able to use unless i'm not tanking. It's quite difficult sometimes to get behind a mob with a 2 second stun and actually have the rear/flanking positional hit and not just tell me i'm not behind or flanking for some reason. Not sure how it's going to be with 2.5 second stuns. Then they're giving monks one of my "class defining skills". Give us back our stilfe you nerfed away already and I'll shut up for the time being.
sigh.
Trentkc
51 Bruiser Nagafen
Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes. Imho Bruiser > Monk, but its a tough call. It also depends on your playing style.