uzhiel feathered serpent wrote:
Its funny how when he quotes the devs, when Opaki asked him to quote them, Opaki tries to interpret it and twist it so it supports the current system. I'm starting to get frustrated by Guards continually try to justify a broken system just so they can say they are the top tank.
Edited by uzhiel feathered serpent on 04-27-2005 11:47 AM
A) I asked someone to quote the devs, someone did, and I thanked them and conceded my claim that the "equal" clause was never there. It was. Others were right, and I was wrong, on that point.
B) I'm not a Guardian, I'm a Bruiser. Look me up. Opaki. Permafrost.
C) I said I was a Brusier in my post. Clearly you didn't read it. Which really reveals why your reading of what I had to say left so much to be desired...because you didn't read it.
D) I don't think the current system in wholly broken. I think it could use tweaking, like everyone does. But the accusation that I'm "twisting words" for my own selfish reasons, when in fact I would greatly benefit by the changes other people are suggesting and I am arguing against is absurd, unwarranted, and ignorant.
As for all the comments of merit on here, I can only say this: raid balance and group-role balance are different beasts, since no matter what, raids need only one tank. It's difficult to do one without the other. I'm a tank, and not a raid tank, and I still don't see anything wrong with that. But I respect the people who see things differently. Try to extend the same, Serpent, and other would be trolls.
Message Edited by Opaki on 04-27-2005 01:30 PM