EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post - Would you PLEASE keep Live Updates on Test longer? (rant)

FamilyManFir · 03-30-2005, 10:59 PM

Moontayle wrote:

FamilyManFirst wrote:
/rant on

Okay, I understand, there was the deadline of the Bloodline Chronicles to consider. I'm sure that's why you tested Live Update #5 on the Test server for all of four days.

I'm curious as to where you get your four days number seeing as how the first vestiges of LU5 was put out on the 11th.

Partly my memory failed me. The bulk of LU#5 was applied to Test on 3/16, not 3/17 as I remembered, so it was on for five days, not four. Yes, a portion of it was applied on 3/11, but not the whole thing. Personally I'm betting that the devs realized they'd have precious little time to fix things and so they pushed out what they had, to test what they could as long as they could.Also, please note that the things that are currently broken (that I know of) are changes made in the 3/16 update, not the 3/11 portion. Hmmm, maybe there's a correlation there?

03-30-2005, 10:59 PM	#12
FamilyManFir Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 499	Moontayle wrote: FamilyManFirst wrote: /rant on Okay, I understand, there was the deadline of the Bloodline Chronicles to consider. I'm sure that's why you tested Live Update #5 on the Test server for all of four days. I'm curious as to where you get your four days number seeing as how the first vestiges of LU5 was put out on the 11th. Partly my memory failed me. The bulk of LU#5 was applied to Test on 3/16, not 3/17 as I remembered, so it was on for five days, not four. Yes, a portion of it was applied on 3/11, but not the whole thing. Personally I'm betting that the devs realized they'd have precious little time to fix things and so they pushed out what they had, to test what they could as long as they could.Also, please note that the things that are currently broken (that I know of) are changes made in the 3/16 update, not the 3/11 portion. Hmmm, maybe there's a correlation there?