View Single Post
Unread 03-14-2006, 06:53 AM   #4
macte

 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 22
Default


DarkPatriott wrote:
First off played a Ranger in EQ1
 
Just curious abou what the Ranger is all about in EQ2.  Are they pretty self sufficent?
 
Also curious about the ratio of Bow to Melee as I would really like to do both about equally.
 
Thats it for now but would really like some help.
 
Thanks,

Coming from EQ1 you are in for a surprise, I'd say  a pleasant surprise.  At least in the 5 years I played EQ1, Rangers were jack of all trades, master of none.  EQ2 Rangers are much more narrowly focused.  We have basically no utility, but we do have a lot of flexibility in our main focus - damage.  Before the last Live Update, we were THE masters of damage.  Now, our damage is lower than it should be, but we still do a good job at it.  That is about to be changed again, bringing us back up to a reasonable level.  If you like to use your abilities, and be able to watch a mob's hit point bar move, this is a class for you.Depending on how you play, an average would be 70% bow and 30% melee.  In solo situations, or duoing with a dress wearer, it'll be more like 5-10% bow, 90+% melee.  We have all the scout/ranger abilities you are used to from eq1, track, speed buff, camo, snare*, root**.  And we just look better than all the other classes.*Snare is virtually meaningless in EQ2.  ** Our current root is extremely situational and doesn't come until level 51.  The root we are getting should be much more useful overall.
macte is offline   Reply With Quote