[DevlDeg]

---

Ebjelen wrote:

---

Jay42 wrote:

---

Anashi wrote:

here's a thought :

do us all a favor and go create a mage and play it instead of whinning ...

---

Here's another thought - learn who the veteran contributors are to the class forums before you make your very first post in order to insult one of them. Neecha has a valid point.

Also, if you're going to accuse someone of whining, try to spell it correctly.

---

Here's a thought - veteran poster does not equal good-ranger-player. Just like swell-armor-tank does not equal good-tank-player.

The first problem here is that you're only considering one variable. Battles in EQ2 are extremely dynamic with not only variable values, but the variables themselves changing constantly from moment to moment. We're talking micro-seconds here between changes. Speed buffs count when you're adversary just got slower. Roots break just as easily as snares and mages don't have anywhere near the mitigation, let alone avoidance, that scouts have.

The second problem is that you're trying to make rangers look bad by making mages look too good. How does that acomplish anything other than whine?

Here's a final thought- high-level-ranger-player does not equal good-ranger-player. Anyone can eventualy make level 50. Anyone, good-player or bad-player can post on this board and offer advice.

Just because everyone does IT doesn't mean IT is right. Double entendres and metaphors were probably intended. If you haven't studied English rhetoric at a college level then this post is probably unintelligble.

---

After you wrote that last sentence I can just see you patting yourself on the back and saying "YES! I am GOOD!"   Very disrespectful.