EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post - Inquisitor, one of the worst healing types?

synistermynist · 12-01-2004, 10:33 PM

BloodSmoke wrote:
Did we get the short end of the stick? I picked Inquis becase i thought he would be the best healing type, class being a cleric and all. But whenever i group with a warden, fury, or Defiler(havent grouped with a templar or Mistic yet), they seem to have much better heals and a much bigger power pool. I'v been in some groups where i was kicked becase a fury was lfg. Why does the inquis seem to suck so much?

I was under the impression that we were used for buffing and debuffing more than healing. Although my Adedt 1 arch heal does 320+ heal and bestowal and mark of pawns seem to be quite nice.

12-01-2004, 10:33 PM	#2
synistermynist Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 7	BloodSmoke wrote: Did we get the short end of the stick? I picked Inquis becase i thought he would be the best healing type, class being a cleric and all. But whenever i group with a warden, fury, or Defiler(havent grouped with a templar or Mistic yet), they seem to have much better heals and a much bigger power pool. I'v been in some groups where i was kicked becase a fury was lfg. Why does the inquis seem to suck so much? I was under the impression that we were used for buffing and debuffing more than healing. Although my Adedt 1 arch heal does 320+ heal and bestowal and mark of pawns seem to be quite nice. __________________ *HADISHINATION*