EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post

bonesbro · 08-31-2005, 06:38 PM

ganjookie wrote:
bonesbro wrote: Hmm. Just thought of something. Other patch notes which refer to all brawler subclasses always say "brawlers, monks, and bruisers" and this one only says brawlers. That would be a good thing to confirm.
Agreed! That would be a nice uograde from brawler to monk/bruiser!

To be clear: I would prefer riposte to be frontal-only for brawlers, monks, and bruisers. In a group or solo situation, the ability to riposte a mob behind you is essentially worthless. However, there are the occasional times where I want to engage a grey mob and keep it alive for a while, and I would prefer not to accidentally kill it. And, because the change applies to NPCs too, it means that it will spare melee classes from ripostes from behind a monk/bruiser NPC.

08-31-2005, 06:38 PM	#14
bonesbro Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 651	ganjookie wrote: bonesbro wrote: Hmm. Just thought of something. Other patch notes which refer to all brawler subclasses always say "brawlers, monks, and bruisers" and this one only says brawlers. That would be a good thing to confirm. Agreed! That would be a nice uograde from brawler to monk/bruiser! To be clear: I would prefer riposte to be frontal-only for brawlers, monks, and bruisers. In a group or solo situation, the ability to riposte a mob behind you is essentially worthless. However, there are the occasional times where I want to engage a grey mob and keep it alive for a while, and I would prefer not to accidentally kill it. And, because the change applies to NPCs too, it means that it will spare melee classes from ripostes from behind a monk/bruiser NPC. __________________ Legond of Najena, Monk Ancient.