Mamaseeta wrote:
Gage-Mikel wrote:
Mamaseeta wrote:
Unfortunatly most people have that opinion of HOs, so noone outs an effort into them. However you can do all your special attacks and get in a HO, it takes some work, but once a group gets its timing down it works really well. Its not a matter of doing HOs or doing special attacks, they work hand in hand.
The effects are way beyond the additional damamge.
So claiming that a class in imballanced because people refuse to use an ability is not a valid arguement. Message Edited by Mamaseeta on 01-24-2005 07:07 PM
HOs are additional abilities, not part of any one class. So therefore yes, it is a valid arguement.
No, rouges claim they dont do enough damamge, yet a lot of there damamge comes from HOs, sence most refuse to use HOs because they believe they suck, they are not doing dammage because they refuse to do one of there abilities is not the fault of SOE ballancing issues. HOs augment classes abilites, priest's HOs allow them to heal better, mage and rogue HOs do the dammage.
HOs sucking is the same misconception as monks cannot tank.
ROFL are you serious? Its not even close to the same.
Heroic Opportunities are ADDITIONAL things that SUPPLEMENT the class. When comparing one classes DPS to the other you shouldn't do it utilizing HOs as HOs are not a median value of each class.
I'd like to see "a lot of their damage" come from an HO when at 50 HOs hit for like 70dmg ;/