EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post

Maelwy · 04-30-2006, 11:36 AM

okay...agreed...zerks can hold their own, in a defensive and aggro maintenence role. Not as ideal as a guard, but certainly 2nd best for mt duties.

But the point was...should a guard, who's clearly leaps and bounds beyond every other class, get even more of what they already excell in, furthering the gap in that role?

Or should Strategies, and creative raid encounters that can emphasize the benefits of other fighters be implemented?

and to be fair to the guards - shouldn't they have another role to play when NOT mt'ing, (albeit with great sacrifices to their aggro/defensive position?)

04-30-2006, 11:36 AM	#5
Maelwy Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 259	okay...agreed...zerks can hold their own, in a defensive and aggro maintenence role. Not as ideal as a guard, but certainly 2nd best for mt duties. But the point was...should a guard, who's clearly leaps and bounds beyond every other class, get even more of what they already excell in, furthering the gap in that role? Or should Strategies, and creative raid encounters that can emphasize the benefits of other fighters be implemented? and to be fair to the guards - shouldn't they have another role to play when NOT mt'ing, (albeit with great sacrifices to their aggro/defensive position?) __________________ 70 Warlock and 70 Bruiser Currently filling NS's official corpse role, AND it's redheaded stepchild position.