EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire - View Single Post

Nemi · 10-27-2005, 02:36 PM

Drulak wrote:

I would not be a monk if you had not done this. So Now i have rolled a monk , as the guardian is a totally boring and useless class to play now , but i still wanted to play EQ2 - so FOTM - i think not , more a need to play a class that wasn't Borked.

Guardians have always been boring class to play. They never had fun skills or unique abilities, so why all of a sudden are people complaining? Oh thats right, because PreLU13 they were supreme.

Its not the class thats the problem, its the players that chose the class purely because they thought they were going to be uber, when uber was never part of this game design.

I hope you get nerfed to and guards get fixed , so that i can play my initial choice in tank again. But that won't happen while you continue to lie to the developers.

Will they make changes to a Guardian? Hope so. Will they make them supreme? No.

10-27-2005, 02:36 PM	#185
Nemi Loremaster Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 603	Drulak wrote: I would not be a monk if you had not done this. So Now i have rolled a monk , as the guardian is a totally boring and useless class to play now , but i still wanted to play EQ2 - so FOTM - i think not , more a need to play a class that wasn't Borked. Guardians have always been boring class to play. They never had fun skills or unique abilities, so why all of a sudden are people complaining? Oh thats right, because PreLU13 they were supreme. Its not the class thats the problem, its the players that chose the class purely because they thought they were going to be uber, when uber was never part of this game design. I hope you get nerfed to and guards get fixed , so that i can play my initial choice in tank again. But that won't happen while you continue to lie to the developers. Will they make changes to a Guardian? Hope so. Will they make them supreme? No.