EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire

EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire (https://archive.eq2wire.com//index.php)
-   Mage's Arcanum (https://archive.eq2wire.com//forumdisplay.php?f=2730)
-   -   Conjy vs Inquisitor (https://archive.eq2wire.com//showthread.php?t=519200)

Uandiiniu5 06-14-2012 05:00 PM

<p>SO I'm having trouble deciding on what i want to play.</p><p>Currently both my inquisitor and conjy have equal aa's (175 each),The inquisitor is 66 and the conjy at 47.</p><p>mostly looking to solo/group (grouping might be a bit lower on my list) and mostly having a challenge to solo heroic/past raid instances <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p><p>I do not,however plan on raiding,as I think I might get burnt out over eq2 from it.</p>

The_Cheeseman 06-18-2012 02:19 AM

<p>Both should be entirely capable of performing whatever solo feats you require. I'd personally opt for the Inquisitor for soloing epics, since Conjys are vulnerable to memwipe mechanics in raid encounters and would be more threatened by AoEs. But that having been said, it probably would come down to which play style you enjoy more.</p>

kAzuNGu 06-28-2012 07:52 AM

<p>Conj will serve you better for soloing. I've pretty much solo'd my way to retirement and rarely did i need help. I have to say that the conj AA setup makes all the difference in survivability. You get many decent survivability options via AA so as long as you have enough points you can spec for soloing and do fine most of the time.</p>


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All threads and posts originally from the EQ2 and Station forums operated by Sony Online Entertainment. Their use is by express written permission.