Inquisitor AA's we dont all want to be Battleclerics

[Giral]

<p>Update Notes : </p><p>Inquisitor</p><ul><li>Devotee's Repentance: Increased damage bonus from 7% to 9% per rank. </li><li>Enhance: Zealotry: Penalties ignore item triggered effects. </li><li>Enhance: Imprison: Improved resistibility reduction from 4% to 5% per rank. </li><li>Enhance: Fearful Conversion: Improved reuse speed bonus from 1.5 seconds to 3 seconds per rank. </li><li>Enhance: Heretic's Demise: Increased damage bonus from 7% to 10% per rank. </li><li>Enhance: Retaliation: Also increases damage by 10% per rank. </li><li>Enhance: Verdict: Increased duration from 5 to 10 seconds in which Verdict is allowed to trigger. </li><li>Punishment: Applies hate increase to enemy's target only each time an effect is</li></ul><p>Was hopefull we would get some Healing/Buffing/Debuffing/Curing love but once again we get More DPS increases </p><p>2 AA re-vamps and once again no reason to repect any of my AA's  </p><p>would realy like an End AA ability that would give a Lotto heal that was being discussed in the thread that was going on the Inquis forums even tho it wasnt asked for in an AA line and was thought it should Just be a Given to our class to make us more equal Healers with Templars </p><p>   or Give us another Emrgancy Heal with a Long Re-cast timer , or a Huge Debuff on a Long re-use timer, or give us an AA that can Cure any Un-curable Group Ailment  on a 15 minute timer , or give us Another Buff to further help Melle groups with there DPS . </p><p>Other Healer classes are Out dps'ing Inquisitor's even when set up with Healing AA line's </p><p>Inquisitor's :</p><p>not the best healer</p><p>not the best debuffer</p><p>not the best buffer</p><p>not the best dps </p><p>Please give Inquisitors something in the lines for Heals/Buffs/Debuff's/Cure's for the Inquisitors that want to take the Other route with there class then the DPS route.    i have DPS classes if i want to DPS i dont need everyclass to be a DPS class !</p><p> Oh well i know im in the minority of Inquisitor's that dont care about DPS , and i will probably once again be told to Betray to a Templar , I chose to play a Inquisitor to be an Evil Cleric Healer, thats kinda hard to do on a Templar : P </p><p>Please Obi Wan Canobi your my only hope <img src="/smilies/385970365b8ed7503b4294502a458efa.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />      </p>

[EvilIguana9]

I can't say if Inquisitors are absolutely the best healers.  I can say that they are at least extremely close to being so.  You really don't need healing focused AAs.  If you had AAs that just made you heal significantly better, everyone would either take them or be relegated to being second class.  That would result in basically a de facto LACK of options rather than fostering any real choices in AA paths.  The whole point of AAs from conception was to give people choices in advancing their characters and the ability to bolster the areas they are weak in.  If other healing classes have AAs that significantly increase their ability to heal, then THEY are the ones that are broken and need to have those abilities nerfed. 

[Nathdorl]

an inq has one position: hes a supporter with healing capabilities in a meleegroup. while doing so whats wrong with having decent DPS yourself? i like the inq just the way it is: not a primary healer but a nice supporter with decent DPS

[Ravaan]

betray to a templar.

[Dynaen]

<cite>Giralus wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Other Healer classes are Out dps'ing Inquisitor's even when set up with Healing AA line's </p></blockquote>No offense, but if you're getting out-dps'd by Templars and Wardens, you really need to learn how to dps and heal at the same time.  Battle cleric or not, you should be doing far more damage than them unless you're MT healing for some reason or on a fight where you're staying out of AE cast range.

[Oakum]

<p>While inquisitors are not all that common a class compared to say fury's and now defilers (I see them a lot more now then I used to) everyone I have grouped/raided with has been able to easily out dps me and one could take aggro from the tank sometimes. Druids trade heavier armor for dps so that isnt right. Fury's are fine, even with their little nerf. Wardens might be if the str/wis druid gear was easily available to them like it is fury's and we could use two handed swords like fury's (prides edge) can. </p><p>Now I haven't figured out what they mean by the natures walk change to warden yet. Going to have to dig into the warden board once I finish reading all the test threads. </p>

[Ramius613]

<cite>Oakum wrote:</cite><blockquote><p>Druids trade heavier armor for dps so that isnt right. Fury's are fine, even with their little nerf. Wardens might be if the str/wis druid gear was easily available to them like it is fury's and we could use two handed swords like fury's (prides edge) can. </p></blockquote>Could you clarify that statement a little because you are talking about 2 class that are in the same subclass (Furies & Wardens are Druids).