PDA

View Full Version : Cruel expansion joke?


crewguy72
03-16-2007, 11:53 AM
<p>this would be really nice, if it has any truth to it.</p><p><a href="http://westkarana.com/index.php/2007/03/08/eq2-rise-of-kunark-rumors/#comment-3101" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"> http://westkarana.com/index.p...s/#comment-3101</a></p>

ZUES
03-16-2007, 11:59 AM
It's not an expansion but the next <b><a href="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?topic_id=352667" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">GU33</a></b>. <--- click!

Cusashorn
03-16-2007, 11:59 AM
The devs have already commented on why they wont add Beastlords... Gnomish Mounts? Meh. Unappealing. Attacking Mounts? Unfair to anyone who owns a carpet, but thats a good thing because carpets are pretty stupid anyway. Iksar models closer to EQlive? They can't get any closer to EQlive than they already are now. Why would they only single out one race anyway? And why downgrade thier models to something less appealing?

Obadiah
03-16-2007, 03:13 PM
<cite>Cusashorn wrote:</cite><blockquote>The devs have already commented on why they wont add Beastlords... Gnomish Mounts? Meh. Unappealing. Attacking Mounts? Unfair to anyone who owns a carpet, but thats a good thing because carpets are pretty stupid anyway. Iksar models closer to EQlive? They can't get any closer to EQlive than they already are now. Why would they only single out one race anyway? And why downgrade thier models to something less appealing?</blockquote> Hey now. As a gnome, I strongly prefer my government cheese carpet (er, hand towel) to riding a miniature horse that looks absolutely ridiculous. Gnomish mounts would be great. Anything but the Shetlands we currently have available. Well, as long as they mean devices made by gnomes, and not mounting gnomes themselves. We really don't run all that fast anyway, so I'm sure whoever made that up must mean the devices.

ZUES
03-16-2007, 03:20 PM
<cite>Obadiah wrote:</cite><blockquote><cite>Cusashorn wrote:</cite><blockquote>The devs have already commented on why they wont add Beastlords... Gnomish Mounts? Meh. Unappealing. Attacking Mounts? Unfair to anyone who owns a carpet, but thats a good thing because carpets are pretty stupid anyway. Iksar models closer to EQlive? They can't get any closer to EQlive than they already are now. Why would they only single out one race anyway? And why downgrade thier models to something less appealing?</blockquote> Hey now. As a gnome, I strongly prefer my government cheese carpet (er, hand towel) to riding a miniature horse that looks absolutely ridiculous. Gnomish mounts would be great. Anything but the Shetlands we currently have available. Well, as long as they mean devices made by gnomes, and not mounting gnomes themselves. We really don't run all that fast anyway, so I'm sure whoever made that up must mean the devices.</blockquote><p>Shetlands? I thought they were a.......</p><p><img src="http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w259/Jixxsawpuzzle/002113e0-6bb11.jpg" border="0"></p>

Obadiah
03-16-2007, 03:29 PM
lol. They might as well be, but I meant the ponies, not the dogs. <img src="/smilies/97ada74b88049a6d50a6ed40898a03d7.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

Wrapye
03-16-2007, 04:01 PM
Someone posted a full list to the In Testing section.  It was a combination of things that were already in game, contradictory statements and misspellings.  A joke at best.

Shade008
03-18-2007, 01:26 AM
cancel that.  wrong concept