View Full Version : Thank you colleague we got attention!

03-10-2005, 06:39 AM
<DIV>Thank you everyone who posted on Skills and Ability board - all I can say we got attention of Moderators at least ...</DIV> <DIV>I dont know if we get tuned up or not but I hope some changes will be done. I dont know if Developers would agree that Beguile should be our class defining spell but at least there is a good chance that changes will reverted to prepatch status so it will have at least some use and once again it will fun to play with.</DIV> <DIV>I am not sure either that some adjustment to our power regeneration will be made but at least we have our points about power cost spells like Mind Eye and Devouring Toughts</DIV> <DIV>I really hope that information about our lvl 50s spell also finally found way to Developers table</DIV> <DIV>All I can say now we cross our fingers and hope for the best</DIV> <DIV>Once again I thank you everyone who came and post who was agree with my point of view and those who agrued with me, I am greatfull to everyone</DIV>

03-10-2005, 07:43 AM
<BR> <P>Tantatus:</P> <P>Fortunatelly there was a very specific post regard Bequile. The repsonse there shows that a tailored statement will get attention. Since, you have more info on the current regen status. I would suggest that you put the specifics in a new thread there. Something to the effect of our power regen was reduced but the power cost is the same. If a comparisson to the Illusionists is necessary, it should also stsae that their was to weak to begin with. I think a comparrission of risk/reward would be more effective, casting power to power regeneration.</P>

03-10-2005, 04:21 PM
<DIV>Yes, looks like we got some RED attention here.  I wish we had team leaders like in DAOC.  There are TONS of Coercer threads since the last nerf patch, and we need one consolidated post that we can all add to.  </DIV>

Orki who Pos
03-10-2005, 05:20 PM
<DIV>The funny thing is, they'll likely fix the charm spell again, and everyone will more or less shut up...</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Coercers will still be a gimped illusionist, but alot will be happy that they got SOMETHING back.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>If you give a poor man a meal, he'll be happy he got one, and not unhappy that he's poor..</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Sad..</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV>

03-10-2005, 05:31 PM
<DIV>Agreed Oki, we nee to keep the pressure up on the other issues as well. For both, Enchanter classes. This way we won't fight with each other but, get both classes fixed.</DIV>

03-10-2005, 05:33 PM
<DIV>Yes, if you read the DEV comments, they think we were happy with our class pre patch.   Little do they know the class needed tons of help prior to their latest nerf patch. </DIV>

03-10-2005, 07:41 PM
<DIV>I also hope that our lvl 50 spells will be looked into</DIV> <DIV>80-110DD AE for 191 power at final lvl 50 spell for a class ... mildly say insulting</DIV>

03-10-2005, 07:43 PM
<blockquote><hr>Azmodeus wrote:<DIV>Yes, if you read the DEV comments, they think we were happy with our class pre patch. Little do they know the class needed tons of help prior to their latest nerf patch. </DIV><hr></blockquote>Exactly. I'd feel better if I actually thought anyone on the dev team or at sony actually played a coercer. My guess is no one does, or at least not to a level that would be of some use. Based on how broke you guys say beguile is I can't imagine anyone actually tested it.

03-10-2005, 08:22 PM
<DIV>Its not only problem of coercers...</DIV> <DIV>Apprently noone bothered to test lvl 37+ spells at all </DIV> <DIV>So to speak coercer do not have any single upgrade since lvl 37 save Ravage Psyche and Mind Eye (since we did not had any analogs of those spells in 30s)</DIV> <DIV>Adepts 3/Master 1 of lvl 20-30 spells have same damage or better output as Adept 1 of lvl 40-50 spells plus Adept 3/Master 1 lvl 20-30 a lot more powerefficient then lvl 40-50 spell</DIV>

03-10-2005, 09:16 PM
<DIV>I posted on the other thread but we are being looked at it seems for all spells. I have been asked to update the consolided issue list on a weekly basis which they will pull for updates for review. I will be posting this new thread over on the other board and hopefully we can keep information flowing. Any specifics as to higher level spell infromation from screenshots of the spell would be helpful (ie the lvl 40-50 spells and the damage they should inflict)</DIV>

03-11-2005, 12:36 AM
<DIV>Thank you very much, Nibbles.  </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'm not high enough to provide input on the higher end spells yet, but I'll help out when/where I can.</DIV>

03-11-2005, 12:48 AM
<DIV>Please note the new thread is up over on other board:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><A href="http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=spellart&message.id=34176" target=_blank>http://eqiiforums.station.sony.com/eq2/board/message?board.id=spellart&message.id=34176</A></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Any comments, changes, ect that you feel would be necessary would be appreciated for the benefit of our class.</DIV>

03-11-2005, 06:06 PM
<DIV>Is it just my machine or do others have problems following the link?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I get "you are not authorised to view this page" when I try to follow the link. I have not had any problems following any other links within these forms.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV><p>Message Edited by encanta on <span class=date_text>03-11-2005</span> <span class=time_text>05:08 AM</span>

03-11-2005, 09:46 PM
<DIV>hmm works for me... well you can just go to the skills board and see it too</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Whats really funnny is if you go to the board now, you will see every other class posting tons of issue in the same format (though i like ours best <heh wonder why&gt<img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Anyhow, Keep on coming with updates and ideas to that thread so we can a) keep it active on the devs minds and b) get some more detailed informaiton to them on ideas.</DIV><p>Message Edited by Nibbles on <span class=date_text>03-11-2005</span> <span class=time_text>11:34 AM</span>

03-12-2005, 04:57 AM
<DIV>lol the devs tell everyone that on thier "consoldiated list of blah blah blah -"</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>nice post!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>thanks for the list!!!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>etc on down the line - </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV>