EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire

 

Go Back   EQ2 Forum Archive @ EQ2Wire > EverQuest II > General EverQuest II Discussion > General Gameplay Discussion
Members List

Notices

Reply
Thread Tools
Unread 02-23-2011, 08:44 PM   #1
Brigh

Loremaster
Brigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,159
Default

I saw chat earlier talking about this then I personally witnessed it myself.

__________________
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you can also just buy.

-Stephen Colbert

CoD3 double XP Rank Up promotion lesson for kids
Brigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 08:52 PM   #2
zimmer

Loremaster
zimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 89
Default

Tradeskill quest for mount?

zimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 08:59 PM   #3
Stubbswick

Loremaster
Stubbswick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 293
Default

Tradeskill one takes a day longer than the adventure one.

Stubbswick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 09:06 PM   #4
Brigh

Loremaster
Brigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,159
Default

I am thinking an exploit/bug. My young one doesn't allow me to get another training quest.
__________________
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you can also just buy.

-Stephen Colbert

CoD3 double XP Rank Up promotion lesson for kids
Brigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 09:07 PM   #5
Glenolas

Loremaster
Glenolas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 787
Default

Brigh wrote:

I am thinking an exploit/bug. My young one doesn't allow me to get another training quest.

I've thinking a Dev account.

Glenolas is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 09:50 PM   #6
Brigh

Loremaster
Brigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,159
Default

Well I know the name of the one person I have seen so if a mod/dev wants to pm me I will give it to them.
__________________
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you can also just buy.

-Stephen Colbert

CoD3 double XP Rank Up promotion lesson for kids
Brigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 09:56 PM   #7
Keianna
Server: Unrest_old
Guild: Veni Vidi Vici
Rank: Raider

Loremaster
Keianna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 45
Default

I saw in chat someone saying that his griffawn wasnt allowing him to exploit the quests anymore.

He was able to finish the first 3 before he wasnt able to continue.

Keianna is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 10:06 PM   #8
Lempo

Loremaster
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,179
Default

yea SOE allowed a lot of people to get a head start on the expansion and apparently feels that it is totally fair.

__________________
All actions have consequences and repercussions.



Somewhere in Norrath a guild is about to dissolve.
Lempo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 10:23 PM   #9
Zephanor
Server: Guk
Guild: Ancient Legacy
Rank: Member

Loremaster
Zephanor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Qeynos
Posts: 140
Default

How did they do that when the CDN didn't have the necessary assests until yesterday? 

__________________
Zephanor is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 10:50 PM   #10
CoLD MeTaL

Loremaster
CoLD MeTaL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,217
Default

You sure you aren't just seeing people on the regular griffon that takes u around the zone same as Antonica or Thundering Steppes?

__________________


CoLD MeTaL is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 11:10 PM   #11
Brigh

Loremaster
Brigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,159
Default

CoLD MeTaL wrote:

You sure you aren't just seeing people on the regular griffon that takes u around the zone same as Antonica or Thundering Steppes?

You don't think I would know the difference?

A certain player hovering above, moving around, and diving down to attack...

__________________
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you can also just buy.

-Stephen Colbert

CoD3 double XP Rank Up promotion lesson for kids
Brigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 11:18 PM   #12
Barx
Server: Antonia Bayle
Guild: Mayhem
Rank: Officers

Loremaster
Barx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Manors of Mithaniel, New Halas
Posts: 3,480
Default

I heard talk of a few exploits that let people do multiple quests and advance the flying mount more quickly in Beta, I'm guessing one or more slipped through and that's probably what is happening.

Barx is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 11:42 PM   #13
Waters

Developer
Waters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 35
Default

Jeff3558 wrote:

yea SOE allowed a lot of people to get a head start on the expansion and apparently feels that it is totally fair.

Not sure what you mean here.  No one gets a head start on live servers, or gets to play the expansion early. 

There was an exploit with the flying mount quest that made it possible to do the quest much faster than intended.  If you see someone flying already, this is the most likely reason for it. 

- Waters

Waters is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 11:49 PM   #14
screenid

Loremaster
screenid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 411
Default

Waters wrote:

Jeff3558 wrote:

yea SOE allowed a lot of people to get a head start on the expansion and apparently feels that it is totally fair.

Not sure what you mean here.  No one gets a head start on live servers, or gets to play the expansion early. 

There was an exploit with the flying mount quest that made it possible to do the quest much faster than intended.  If you see someone flying already, this is the most likely reason for it. 

- Waters

=-(  Well then you need to remove the 18 hr wait between quest for the rest of us.  =-)

__________________


screenid is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-23-2011, 11:51 PM   #15
Gungo

Loremaster
Gungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushbone
Posts: 5,378
Default

I think he should permantly disable flight for the exploiters cause it would be funny.

Gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:05 AM   #16
Gaige

Loremaster
Gaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 9,500
Default

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

I think he should permantly disable flight for the exploiters cause it would be funny.

All the bugs were reported in beta and nothing were done about them, as usual.

__________________
Gaige is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:11 AM   #17
Brigh

Loremaster
Brigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,159
Default

Waters wrote:

Jeff3558 wrote:

yea SOE allowed a lot of people to get a head start on the expansion and apparently feels that it is totally fair.

Not sure what you mean here.  No one gets a head start on live servers, or gets to play the expansion early. 

There was an exploit with the flying mount quest that made it possible to do the quest much faster than intended.  If you see someone flying already, this is the most likely reason for it. 

- Waters

Shouldn't these people have their flight status grounded then? Should I send petition notifiying a GM of the person I saw?

__________________
Anything you can achieve through hard work, you can also just buy.

-Stephen Colbert

CoD3 double XP Rank Up promotion lesson for kids
Brigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:25 AM   #18
Gungo

Loremaster
Gungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushbone
Posts: 5,378
Default

Gaige wrote:

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

I think he should permantly disable flight for the exploiters cause it would be funny.

All the bugs were reported in beta and nothing were done about them, as usual.

SO an exploit goes through and people knew about it and then exploited it. Seems to me that warrants a nice 30-60day removal of flight. Its not permanant and should help encourage people not to exploit.

Gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:32 AM   #19
Gaige

Loremaster
Gaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 9,500
Default

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

SO an exploit goes through and people knew about it and then exploited it. Seems to me that warrants a nice 30-60day removal of flight. Its not permanant and should help encourage people not to exploit.

They can do what they want but if they ever punish me for doing something that was reported in beta by numerous people I know I won't be playing this game anymore.

IMO it isn't even an exploit.  Duping coin?  Sure.  Leveling exploits?  Okay.  Doing quests as intended for a reward?  Not an exploit.  If it wasn't intended why didn't they fix it since I know for a fact this bug and numerous others were sent along during beta.  Bugged/reported and not fixed = working as intended in my book.  I donated tons of hours testing DoV, to be punished for SOE's lack of action would be an insult.

__________________
Gaige is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:42 AM   #20
Gungo

Loremaster
Gungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushbone
Posts: 5,378
Default

Gaige wrote:

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

SO an exploit goes through and people knew about it and then exploited it. Seems to me that warrants a nice 30-60day removal of flight. Its not permanant and should help encourage people not to exploit.

They can do what they want but if they ever punish me for doing something that was reported in beta by numerous people I know I won't be playing this game anymore.

IMO it isn't even an exploit.  Duping coin?  Sure.  Leveling exploits?  Okay.  Doing quests as intended for a reward?  Not an exploit.  If it wasn't intended why didn't they fix it since I know for a fact this bug and numerous others were sent along during beta.  Bugged/reported and not fixed = working as intended in my book.  I donated tons of hours testing DoV, to be punished for SOE's lack of action would be an insult.

You donoted tons of hours to find an exploit and then use it.  The problem is you should of never used the exploit. since you did NOT do the quest as intended.

Duping results in account banning. Using an exploit you found in beta should warrant some form of action of course not as sever as banning. Since it only encourages people such as yourself from exploiting again. And then using the excuse of well I reported it in beta. (You are a great example since this wouldnt be the first time for you using preexsisting exploits)

Gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:47 AM   #21
Gaige

Loremaster
Gaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 9,500
Default

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

You donoted tons of hours to find an exploit and then use it.  

Can you read?  We found exploits AND THEN I PERSONALLY EMAILED DEVS AND REPORTED THEM.  Some devs fixed things quickly some fixed things slowly and some didn't fix anything at all, which means to me it didn't need to be fixed because it was working as intended.  Anyone who is flying right now had to do all the quests, you couldn't exploit from the pet to the mount without doing anything.

/shrug

They're already messing up by limiting the amount of repeatables you can do for faction each day and other stupid decisions making this game even worse because I hate being locked out of progression by artificial means.

So again, let them "punish" people for this with your amazing recommendations, probably doing anything who is flying today a favor in the long run anyway.

Also:  I never said I have my mount yet, you're assuming.  I'm just saying I know for a fact that all the flying mount bugs were reported during the beta.

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

(You are a great example since this wouldnt be the first time for you using preexsisting exploits)

Like?

Do you mean in RoK when I got my own guildies banned for exploiting leveling?  How about in SF when I got my own guildies stripped/suspended for duping in BGs?  How about in SF when I got the poisoned wave respawns fixed despite some of my own guildies using them to level?

Any real examples or you just talking out of what you should be sitting on?

__________________
Gaige is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:55 AM   #22
NViDiaFReaK

Loremaster
NViDiaFReaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Woodlands, Tx
Posts: 544
Default

This is just outrageous.  Either the quest needs to have the 18 hour restriction removed. Or the people who EXPLOITED the quest need to have their mounts removed, quest reset and banned for a at least a week.  Using knowledge that was aquired during beta to do something that was not intended is an exploit.  Just because it wasnt fixed does not = working as intended.   It was stated MANY MANY MANY times that the griffawn quests where INTENDED to have an 18 hour timer between each one.

Beta should not be used as a method for learning how to CHEAT everyone else on the server UNFAIRLY.  Its like insider training on wallstreet.  Using your knowledge to get ahead of everyone else.

If I was SOE I would even make sure those beta testers who did exploit this do not get future beta invites.

I will be really suprised to see SOE actually do something about this though.

__________________
NViDiaFReaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:56 AM   #23
Gungo

Loremaster
Gungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushbone
Posts: 5,378
Default

Gaige wrote:

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

You donoted tons of hours to find an exploit and then use it.  

Can you read?  We found exploits AND THEN I PERSONALLY EMAILED DEVS AND REPORTED THEM.  Some devs fixed things quickly some fixed things slowly and some didn't fix anything at all, which means to me it didn't need to be fixed because it was working as intended.  Anyone who is flying right now had to do all the quests, you couldn't exploit from the pet to the mount without doing anything.

/shrug

They're already messing up by limiting the amount of repeatables you can do for faction each day and other stupid decisions making this game even worse because I hate being locked out of progression by artificial means.

So again, let them "punish" people for this with your amazing recommendations, probably doing anything who is flying today a favor in the long run anyway.

Also:  I never said I have my mount yet, you're assuming.  I'm just saying I know for a fact that all the flying mount bugs were reported during the beta.

I love it when you get defensive over your exploits. Look I didnt need to assume anything when you specifically said "They can do what they want but if they ever punish me for doing something that was reported in beta by numerous people I know I won't be playing this game anymore."

This is you implying you exploited.

Doing all the quests had nothing to do with the fact you intenionally skipped the 18hour delay on each step. That is the exploit. The exploit you claimed you KNEW about in beta. The exploit you claimed you KNEW was a bug in beta and then sent bug reports about. The devs and senior producer stated several times was intended to be a 5 day reward. Claiming ignorance at this point doesnt do you any favors.

So yes punishing people that exploit is a deterrant from them exploiting again. Especially those who are suppose to be beta testing instead of trying to find exploits so they can use when an expansion goes live.  A 30-60 day removal of flight access on a toon is a perfectly acceptable and non permanant deterence to discourage exploiters such as yourself.

Gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 12:58 AM   #24
Gungo

Loremaster
Gungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushbone
Posts: 5,378
Default

Gaige wrote:

Like?

Do you mean in RoK when I got my own guildies banned for exploiting leveling?  How about in SF when I got my own guildies stripped/suspended for duping in BGs?  How about in SF when I got the poisoned wave respawns fixed despite some of my own guildies using them to level?

Any real examples or you just talking out of what you should be sitting on?

tranquility loot exploit 3 princes loot exploitshard of hate loot exploitSeveral item exploits

You pick and choose what you think is an exploit and only get mad when it doesnt benefit you.

Gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 01:00 AM   #25
NViDiaFReaK

Loremaster
NViDiaFReaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Woodlands, Tx
Posts: 544
Default

Gaige wrote:

  Some devs fixed things quickly some fixed things slowly and some didn't fix anything at all, which means to me it didn't need to be fixed because it was working as intended. 

are you really that naive that even though it was stated multiple times in many different formats that the mount was intended to take several days to complete.  It was stated that there was to be 18 hours between each quest.    If you or anyone else did anything to speed that process up then that was the exploit.  Sure they had to do all the quests but if they bypassed the 18 hour wait between doing them they exploited.

__________________
NViDiaFReaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 01:02 AM   #26
Gungo

Loremaster
Gungo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Crushbone
Posts: 5,378
Default

Padeshar@Antonia Bayle wrote:

If I was SOE I would even make sure those beta testers who did exploit this do not get future beta invites.

I will be really suprised to see SOE actually do something about this though.

I agree I am completely surprised SOE continues to reinvite the same people who exploit over and over to beta. And feign surprise when they exploit again.

Gungo is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 01:06 AM   #27
Gaige

Loremaster
Gaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 9,500
Default

Padeshar@Antonia Bayle wrote:

Just because it wasnt fixed does not = working as intended

Says who?  Of the flying mount bugs that were reported all of the others were fixed.  It shouldn't have went live if it wasn't intended and if they ban people for doing ACTUALLY DOING THE QUESTS its beyond silly.

Comparing it to item duping is also lol.

Gungo@Crushbone wrote:

tranquility loot exploit 

3 princes loot exploitshard of hate loot exploitSeveral item exploits

You pick and choose what you think is an exploit and only get mad when it doesnt benefit you.

I wasn't in Confirmed when they did the Tranquility exploit.

I wasn't in Dissolution when they did the Shard of Hate sisters exploit.

No idea on 3 Princes or the "several item exploits" either.

__________________
Gaige is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 01:07 AM   #28
Liavy
Server: Kithicor
Guild: Malicious Intentions
Rank: Recruit

Loremaster
Liavy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 44
Default

Artificial lockout between quests was a terrible idea anyway. Save your time trying to dig through logs and just remove the restriction altogether for a day, or permanently. It's pretty silly that such a ridiculous idea as this 18 hours between quests made it through beta anyway despite the feedback. Also silly that such an exploit that I myself also reported several times in several different ways made it to live.

Time to take some responsibility for your mistakes and compensate for them imo.

Liavy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 01:08 AM   #29
NViDiaFReaK

Loremaster
NViDiaFReaK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Woodlands, Tx
Posts: 544
Default

Gaige wrote:

Padeshar@Antonia Bayle wrote:

Just because it wasnt fixed does not = working as intended

Says who?  Of the flying mount bugs that were reported all of the others were fixed.  It shouldn't have went live if it wasn't intended and if they ban people for doing ACTUALLY DOING THE QUESTS its beyond silly.

Comparing it to item duping is also lol.

Seriously your logic is severly flawed man.. you KNEW and everyone else knows that the quests where made to be done 18 hours apart.  There where specific things you had to do to get the quests done early.. That is pure definition of Exploiting..

__________________
NViDiaFReaK is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-24-2011, 01:09 AM   #30
Gaige

Loremaster
Gaige's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 9,500
Default

Padeshar@Antonia Bayle wrote:

If I was SOE I would even make sure those beta testers who did exploit this do not get future beta invites.

I will be really suprised to see SOE actually do something about this though.

Sure, don't get the players in beta that break things and report them.  That'd be a great, worthwhile beta test, wouldn't it?

__________________
Gaige is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 AM.

vBulletin skin by: CompleteGFX.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All threads and posts originally from the EQ2 and Station forums operated by Sony Online Entertainment. Their use is by express written permission.