|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 47
|
![]() I am a serker, well my main toon is, so I write this from my point of view, although I'm sure that there are other classes that will have the same issue. ok, i've been looking on test, reading the notes and trying to figure this all out and just can't find a way to make me happy in this. You see in LU 52 there will be some mergers, I'm happy about most of them, and understand the ones I don't like even, but I'm upset on one feature. You see I selected Berserk Rage as my serkers lvl 75 Master 2. In doing so I gave a ex guildie my M1 spell for the Berserk Rage and have passed on the drop several times in game, not that I would have won it in a roll anyways, but still I passed on the opportunity to other serkers who needed it. Now because I had the M2 everyone I let have the M1 will now get an offensive and defensive M1 stance when they merge? and me, no. Because I had the M2 I get bupkiss. I understand you can't make the stnaces go to M2 as they don't exist, but you could give us the same consideration as those we allowed to have the M1 spells. I'm really irked by this one, it just sucks that I'm loosing my M2 buff and getting squat for it while those I've helped out in the past will now get two M1 stances for the price of 1. I know you can't always make everyone happy, but really, this one in particular really just sucks big time. Thanks for listening Stavery lvl 80 Serker Order of Marr Lucan D'lere Server |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 47
|
![]() just another FYI on this, If i take the level 64 Master 2 stance choice on test, the stats on my lvl 64 M 2 stance is better than the Adept 3 lvl 74 stance. to me this is just broken |
![]() |
![]() |