has any1 tried...

ssythe · 08-20-2007, 11:59 PM

Any1 try maxxing out spell crits, melee,crits and trample? was kinda curious what kind of dps sk's could be pushing with that kinda set up

Cajetans · 08-21-2007, 07:31 AM

Im currently running this setup on a 64 SK (4/4/8 INT, 4/5/8 STA, 4/4/8 AGI). So far I'm not that impressed concerning DPS but there has to come a fat 2h yet with a nice proc. Moreover I mostly occupied the Tankspot so no Delay-timing of my 2h. Holding aggro from Warlocks and Nekros seems to be an issue as well, seems as if I was better off with STR/STA/INT-Spec. But as Gnarkill (I think) tried this build as well and was very satisfied I'd say you need play endgame and a supportive non-tanking role to get this sort of SK shining.

MaCloud1032 · 08-21-2007, 09:48 AM

I have tried it and didnt care for it. There just isnt enough large grouping of mobs anymore. And with SOE dumbing the game down a lot of our AoE dmg just doesnt work much. There is also a lot of posisioning you have to do for the full benefit of the trample.

If i were our MT for raids i would probly go agi 4,4,8,8 int 4,4,8 str 4,5

As MT we get to posision the mobs and would benefit from the trample a bit more. The extra 8 in the agi line would help are avoidance crits are crits.

Iam sure i would make some chages as i went to this build but i think this would be the best use of the trample if your a mt.

Coica · 08-21-2007, 10:45 AM

tried it, liked it, but I'm sticking with DA at the moment.

08-21-2007, 09:48 AM	#3
MaCloud1032 Loremaster Join Date: Mar 2006 Posts: 655	I have tried it and didnt care for it. There just isnt enough large grouping of mobs anymore. And with SOE dumbing the game down a lot of our AoE dmg just doesnt work much. There is also a lot of posisioning you have to do for the full benefit of the trample. If i were our MT for raids i would probly go agi 4,4,8,8 int 4,4,8 str 4,5 As MT we get to posision the mobs and would benefit from the trample a bit more. The extra 8 in the agi line would help are avoidance crits are crits. Iam sure i would make some chages as i went to this build but i think this would be the best use of the trample if your a mt. __________________

08-21-2007, 10:45 AM	#4
Coica Loremaster Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Dallas Posts: 337	tried it, liked it, but I'm sticking with DA at the moment. __________________

08-20-2007, 11:59 PM	#1
ssythe Loremaster Join Date: Dec 2004 Posts: 57	Any1 try maxxing out spell crits, melee,crits and trample? was kinda curious what kind of dps sk's could be pushing with that kinda set up

08-21-2007, 07:31 AM	#2
Cajetans Loremaster Join Date: Jun 2006 Posts: 24	Im currently running this setup on a 64 SK (4/4/8 INT, 4/5/8 STA, 4/4/8 AGI). So far I'm not that impressed concerning DPS but there has to come a fat 2h yet with a nice proc. Moreover I mostly occupied the Tankspot so no Delay-timing of my 2h. Holding aggro from Warlocks and Nekros seems to be an issue as well, seems as if I was better off with STR/STA/INT-Spec. But as Gnarkill (I think) tried this build as well and was very satisfied I'd say you need play endgame and a supportive non-tanking role to get this sort of SK shining.