|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 587
|
![]() Just a quick question about the T6 spell Control Undeath. Can anyone verify it scales with the quality level of the spell? Here is a thread in another forum concerning the lack of scaling of some of these legendary type spells where spell quality doesnt matter (ad1, ad3, m1 all the same) for spells like Call of the Hero. Just wanted to make sure it scales before using a rare on it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 89
|
![]()
not entirely sure how it would scale, unless the better the spell quality, the less chance it had of breaking. Doesn't seem that effective in all honesty. Spectre in Oasis lasted from 5-10 mins before breaking at most. Consul in Silent City lasted about 30 seconds.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 587
|
![]() Yeah I was wondering if the higher quality spell would have a resist mod of some sort, but not sure. If not that then I cant think of anything that could be upgraded since cast time/duration/power cost should all be static. Hmm maybe I should just trade my Vanadium for a pearl and get an imbued INT ring made.... Im about 5% from 54 and cant think of anything other than Control Undeath I would consider upgrading this soon. I am averaging about a rare/level with just harvesting while I solo, so Im really not inclined to use the rare on a 56+ spell that I wont be able to scribe for weeks. I already have my tank pet, dogs and drawing souls ad3 and I plan on taking the offensive buff at 54 for my M2. I dont have the spell list in front of me but Im drawing blanks on great upgrades till higher levels (scout pet, consumption, AE) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
|
![]() A post made the other day by a dev says these spells are all the same. The adept 1 versions are the same as adept 3 and it is not changing. The reason they gave was that they wanted players the opportunity to have a dropped version but if you cannot find one, you can use a rare and have it made. I really wish the wonderfully thoughtful devs at SOE could have told us this from Day 1 so people were not wasting rares. I already wasted a rare on drawing and control, and luckily found consumption ad1 for 17gp. I will be able to scribe control in 5% more exp so will be hunting down the ad1 hopefully tonight so I can resell the ad3 and get some coin back for the wasted rares. Especially since we cant even use 1/3 of the Drawing spells.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 587
|
![]()
I believe the post you are referring to is the one I linked. What I got from it is that SOME of the new 52, 55, 58 spells dont scale - but most still do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,372
|
![]() Everything in there seems to indicate it is universal for all the ancient scrolls. Not sure though, but they dont differentiate anywhere in there that I can see between ones that scale and ones that dont. The red name even said the adept 3 and adept 1 titles are being removed so people are not confuses.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 587
|
![]() Yeah Beghn's "clarification" post only seemed to confuse things more. I do have Drawing Souls ad3 so I can compare that to an ad1 if I can find it on the broker. I also have Consumption banked at ad1 and will try to compare it if there is an ad3 on the broker (not likely). But, even if there is a difference it might be changed soon so there is no difference........cant really tell from Beghn's posts.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 850
|
![]() It's quite tough to figure out just what he was saying... the gist I got was only the spells with no difference when upgraded would be effected but Ben never actually says it's only the things like CotH that won't have scaling upgrades. Always a mystery are development responses.
__________________
Want to learn about Necromancers? Check out The Necromancer FAQ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 587
|
![]() When 500 years old you reach, look as good you will not.
Well I think till I see a definative (relatively) dev response I think I will hold off ad3'ing Control Undeath and will probably swap my Vanadium for a pearl and make an imbued INT ring. Plenty of time to harvest next level if I end up still wanting it hehe. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 123
|
![]()
It would be kind of [expletive haxx0red by Raijinn] for this one not to scale, considering the coercer charm spell can be upgraded. I think some of the very specific spells will be like this. They already said call of the hero is one of them. But we know Consumption(Master 1) exists.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 237
|
![]() Drawing of souls and consumption both scale with spell quality. get adept 3 made if you cant find a master 1.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 89
|
![]()
ok - according to the spell description, the higher the spell quality for charm undead, the less chance of it breaking at each point the mob can attempt to resist the spell. so I would say if you intent on doing a lot of charming, its probably worth the adept 3, if not then you can happily wait for the adept 1. imho, from what I have played with, it may/may not be worth the adept 3 as I couldn't see it being reliably used for much more than some additional crowd control most of the time. It isnt reliable enough to create an extra pet in zones you are likely to be xping in. As an additional annoyance, its also one of those irritating spells that toggle - so you can't just recast it every now and again, casting while it is on switches it off (gawd i hate those spells, I really do)
Message Edited by Tinantier on 10-13-2005 12:26 AM |
![]() |
![]() |