|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18
|
![]()
Hi there. As we all know these forums are a wealth of information and have pretty much everything a coercer would need to know to be successful. One problem I see though is sometimes it's hard to locate that data and sometimes it's buried under page after page of different posts.Anyway, my idea is to make a website based on the information gathered from this message board about the EQ2 Coercer. Most of this information would come from the informative posts others have made (with the permission of the OP, of course). For example, one idea I have is for a database where people would be able to submit and edit various pet stats. Basically what I'm here to ask is if anyone would be at all interested in that or if anyone knows of a website like this in existence that I was just unable to find. I don't want to make a website just to find that it's already been done or that nobody will ever use it.Anyway, please tell me what you think and send any suggestions and criticism this way. Thanks!
__________________
Sterling L70 Coercer Belt L70 Brigand Magnate L63 Defiler Crushbone |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13
|
![]() To be honest, most times you can just ask in the worldwide coercer(enchanter chat since we do have illusionists in there too). /join nektulos.coercer Feel free to make a site, but it's not quite like EQ1 here, apart from ogaming for quests and stuff, I usually see more people get information on their class from the relevant channel whilst in game. But that's just my 2cp
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 13
|
![]()
I'd like it beacuse I play on Naggy and can't join the serverwide chats.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 30
|
![]()
Yep a site would be good. Especially to consolidate good guides / posts.Other classes have their favourite web pages as well as the SOE official boards.BUT, in my experience they require heavy moderation
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |