|
Notices |
![]() |
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Berlin
Posts: 84
|
![]()
do you use it? I prefer to cast DD (like sth from the Ego Shock line) because mobs are faster dead and it need some cycles of casting DG and OS to bring enemys power to zero.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
General
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,040
|
![]() When taking on nameds, or mobs where your group shouldn't be(read pally as your only healer) they're useful. Else, more damage is better.
__________________
Calaglin, Former Illusionist/Guild Leader of Dissolution on Nektulos Calaglin, Former Illusionist/Guild Leader of Confirmed on Unrest |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Loremaster
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 63
|
![]()
if you got a pet that nukes for 2,2k+ -- and a caster mob that could kill your mob, you would prefer stunning/stifling
![]()
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 95
|
![]() Yeah, I rarely use stifle on non-named mobs unless it's to keep the pet alive or I'm in a delicate situation. However, it trivializes nameds, the ones in roost and such are sissified if a coercer is present (with stuns and stifle you can keep a mob from using abilities EVER, and rarely even getting autoattacks in.) -Proboscus, 58 coercer, Neriak
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 15
|
![]()
I used those alot yesterday when we went into Nectropos castle with a group consisting of me, 2 wizards and a warlock
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |