Question about non-raiding paladin.

[Nefrate]

<DIV>What is making the paladin class a good one to play for someoen who will probably never doa  single raid.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I played on in EQ1 and it was nice to be a very good Group thnak that could snag aggro rpetty easely. Also I had  probably the best hybride buffs, and I could Self heala nd group heal for good during a fight.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>What are EQ2 paladin look liek comparing to EQ1 paladin  if you can't raid ?</DIV>

[Wulfborne]

Well, since the only "issues" anyone has ever mentioned with a paladin are for raid tanking and PvP... If you are just playing PvE and never going to raid, the paladin is the ultimate tank. Excellent aggro, good survivability, etc. We kill a little slower than the DPS classes, but we also are more likely to live through adds and such too. (DPS love us to tank for them also, so if you like to group, it's not too hard to find one).~Sir Hawke Holyblayde, Hero of Maj'Dul<div></div>

[khufure]

I like my paladin.  Amends is really a great group ability.  If I had to do it over again I'd probably go zerker though.  More HP and at the moment they can double us in DPS.<div></div>

[g0thiC_iCe_cReaM]

<DIV>paladins are great tanks both groups and raids, best healer to take with you imo is a fury, i duoed to 59 with a fury and i have to say the combination of the HoT and your ward is awesome...once you put amends on your partner or the highest dps you won't have any trouble loosing agro...they're a pretty solid class solo and in groups, i didn't like my pally through my 20s much, but once you get into yer 30s they really start to shine</DIV>