Is it wrong??

[CloakV]

Is it wrong for me to get so excited over oath strike. Its what I've been dreaming of sinse 20th level. Finaly scribed it adept 1 last night.  I'm in love and for once its with something that doesnt have boobies. Ahem. Sorry really rather bored. <span>:smileyvery-happy:</span> <div></div>

[Boli32]

No, after the long grind from lvl 24-->28 where guardians and priests suppased us in terms of damage it is a much needed boast. I'm under the immpression that this is our "pity art" that bumps up to where we shodul be in terms of damage... after all for most who have the DPS parsers oath strike does almost HALF their damage. <div></div>

[Platfing]

<DIV><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE>It's wonderful - for both damage and helping to gain agro.  Just remember to stun before casting it.</BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV>

[CloakV]

<span><blockquote><hr>Platfinger wrote:<div> <blockquote>It's wonderful - for both damage and helping to gain agro.  Just remember to stun before casting it.</blockquote></div><hr></blockquote> Errmm, ok being a noob here. Why stun the mob first i though this attack was non- interuptable like most CA's? Thanks </span><div></div>

[prisoner]

Oh its interruptable all right... if you get stunned.  However,  this art is notorious for missing or being parried/blocked, whatever.  Stunning them first seems to increase the chance that it will land.  <div></div>

[Pathin Merrithay]

<DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Oath Strike is a benchmark spell for Paladin damage. 8 Levels later and it's still my primary damage dealer for very obvious reasons.</DIV>

[Titali]

<DIV>our stuns last .9, oath strike takes 1 second to cast. aside from the fact its more than 1 second because its gotta que up and account for lag and what not, stunning doesnt help, its just coincidence.</DIV>