End game analysis missing avoidance?

[Sine]

<div></div>why is it all end game analysis of crusaders leaves out a discussion of avoidance?  Everyone just discusses mit and HP.  Is it not designed to be:monkies/bruiser: highest avoid: lowest mitcrusaders: mid avoid: mid mitguards/zerks: low avoid: highest mit.Now back in the old days guards/zerks got the tower so their avoid was artificially high relative to us, but now we got the tower too.  Wouldn't our higher avoidance (sks +parry, pallies get +def) statistically make up for the lower mit (assuming the mit capp was not reached)Another question, does anybody know how to calculate the mit cap vs a mobs level?  Correctly me if i am wrong but 80% is the mit cap you can do vs any mob correct?  The higher the mob the harder is it to reach the mit cap vs them.Edit: well it appears they get a +parry avoidance type spell at 60 too.  So I guess we don't have the edge in avoidance that I thought.  Still would like to know how to calc mit cap though.<div></div><p>Message Edited by Sineri on <span class=date_text>07-04-2006</span> <span class=time_text>03:25 PM</span>