PDA

View Full Version : Tainted Sacrament or Tainted Excrement???


Ronte
05-29-2005, 08:47 PM
<DIV>Anybody else notice they misspelled our pet's name?  It is not "a tainted soul", it should be "a tainted stool"</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Seriously, who in the art department thought that looks good?  Why would they even make an animation model like that.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Great spell though.</DIV>

Zoradan
05-29-2005, 09:27 PM
Ya the puddle of poo poo sucks, but dose it's job. <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>The supper chicken works well to but still think it's not the right figure for a SK  /shrug.</DIV>

JRav
06-04-2005, 03:31 AM
Am I the only one who thinks the spirit hawk looks awesome? <img src="/smilies/69934afc394145350659cd7add244ca9.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />

Ldymacbe
06-04-2005, 07:20 AM
It would look awesome for a shaman type.  I, however, am a shadowknight, and wonder what the devs were smoking when they said hey, "polly the parrot of Doooommm" would be a perfect pet for a shadowknight.  I want one of the hellhounds from the bloodlines !! Now *that* is a pet for an sk! <div></div>

Hooster
06-08-2005, 09:21 PM
<P>How about a bat?  or a swarm of them for our upgrade? :smileyvery-happy:</P> <P>Snakes are evil too.  </P> <P>I agree, the [Removed for Content], the bird, and the prancing brown pony just don't seem very evil to me.  Then again....not much about the SK is very evil.</P>

Collaud
06-09-2005, 01:22 AM
Yep, the SK pet graphics really disappoint me too.  I can think of 1,000 other graphics that would suit an SK better.  I just can't imagine what was going through the dev's heads when they settled on the [Removed for Content] and ghost bird.  They really underestimate how important little things like this are to us players.

Diern
06-09-2005, 12:47 PM
<P>Still cant understand why they just didnt give it a skeleton skin (ala la EQ1) or even better something like a vampire, or ghoul</P> <P>I guess this just reinforces the fact that the EQ2 Shadowknight is a pale mockery of the proud Shadowknights of legend.</P>

Soupnuts
06-13-2005, 08:56 AM
Should have been called a "Tortured Soul" and have the look of a wraith or something equally wicked. Something that looks like a Dementor out of Harry Potter would be cool.

Phaer
06-14-2005, 12:29 AM
<P>I have seen other posts refer to the 26th pet as "Gloopy the Tortured Stool"  Come on Dev's!  What happend to the good, old-fashioned skeleton pet of EQ I at least?</P> <P>I would agree, a hell-hound or shade (dementor) graphic would be cooler than the puddle of puss we have now.</P> <P> </P> <P>Sanguinary</P> <P>Shadowknight - Antonia Bayle</P> <P> </P>

Primaux_Optimaus
06-14-2005, 07:46 PM
Yeah, I won't lie, it is extremely lame considering what the Tainted Caress description is.  I was really pumped when I first got it and it said pulls the soul from your victim to fight for you during battle etc. etc... I thought it would have been an actual soul or something resembling a soul.. But we get the playdo and as I call it, the pigeon of doom.  Sony needs to definately fix this.  I'd be happy if you give me back my EQ1 skellie with my dual flaming swords.. Now THAT was a SK pet... Opti 50 SK of RE

SonnyA
06-16-2005, 01:26 PM
I don't disagree.with the topic, but we're back to the horse look again. When we start complaining about the looks of our spells, it's a signal that we don't have any really important issues.