NERFED - This is a question

[BraveSma]

<DIV>Could someone please explain what all the nerfed/supposedly sucky things are about shakowknights.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Pretty recently, there was a lot of griping about mounts and stuff, but since I don't have a SK I kinda missed out on the gripage.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'm considering shadowknight. I need to know all these bad things.</DIV>

[The_Witchfind]

<BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> BraveSmart wrote:<BR> <DIV>Could someone please explain what all the nerfed/supposedly sucky things are about shakowknights.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Pretty recently, there was a lot of griping about mounts and stuff, but since I don't have a SK I kinda missed out on the gripage.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I'm considering shadowknight. I need to know all these bad things.</DIV><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <DIV>Spend 10 minutes reading the forums!</DIV>

[CountDrunkula]

We do have more than our fair share of issues (which I will not attempt to rehash here as there are numerous other threads already dedicated to that purpose...suffice to say the steed thing is NOT what the majority of the SK population is upset about hehe).  Problems range from broken/underpowered/useless abilities, to balancing issues, to end-game tanking ability. That being said....at lvl 31 I still enjoy my SK very much. It takes a bit more artistry and attentiveness to do the job well than it reportedly does w/ other tank classes,  but that , I guess is a question of play style. Please note that many of the reported problems inherent in the class affect higher levels SK's (particularly in high level raids), so I really have  no basis (at my level) to speak  on those issues in an informed manner, I can only pray to the dark one that they get fixed before I get there. So...bottom line...do we have problems?...yes, and plenty of them. Does it stop me from playing and enjoying my SK?...certainly not.....not yet at least... *crosses fingers* <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> <div></div>