Isn't it strange...

[LordTa]

that the bruiser description discusses that their own body is a weapon, etc. ...and how the STR AA line benefits monks more so than bruisers. Did I miss the boat on this one or maybe they need to swap descriptions of class?  Do you think the devs are done with the AAs or that there will be more brawler tweaks in the future?Just a thought.  It kind of makes me sad as I can really invision a "weapons-free" churck norris errr... I mean bruiser.  Sorry I get the two confused.<div></div>

[Wargod1968]

<div></div><p>I ignore the class descriptions. Trying to rectify them with actual game performance is an excercise in non-logical thought.</p>

[Razorbak]

I like to think of it as an excercise in Sony logic - which is a twisting chain of thought that mutates according to what group of people Sony is talking to.

[ganjookie]

I think AAs where being worked on before they decided to change the whole class/subclass pre 20.  Looks like most class AAs are based around the qeynos subclass.  SO yeah monks get buffed more then we would cause it is ment for them.Why would we get  another teleport attack...? I eman 2 is nice and all..but c'mon..C'MON<div></div>

[PhozFa]

<blockquote><hr>ganjookie wrote:I think AAs where being worked on before they decided to change the whole class/subclass pre 20.  Looks like most class AAs are based around the qeynos subclass.  SO yeah monks get buffed more then we would cause it is ment for them.Why would we get  another teleport attack...? I eman 2 is nice and all..but c'mon..C'MON<div></div><hr></blockquote>lol yea qeynos classes get thought of first. I remember a few updates ago SKs were upset sony refered to thier aas as PALLY aas not crusader<div></div>