PDA

View Full Version : Just in case some of you guys wanted to know hwo we are doign in beta


Gungo
09-04-2005, 12:40 AM
<DIV> <DIV>Noah from FoH wrote:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Did some comparison between a Monk and myself.  I dont see where the big issue is coming up with "brawlers" being this awesome tank.  Here is what i showed for stats.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2> <P>               Guardian    Monk</P> <P>Unbuffed   4230           3471  -hps</P> <P>               2748           1146   - miti</P> <P>               53.9            67.2   - avoidance</P> <P>Buffed      4812          3933</P> <P>               3536/ 70.7     2192/ 43.8</P> <P>                61.0            74.2</P> <P>We were in the same group.  I probably have a bonus of 10% more mitigation comparing armor (IE i have more fabled then the monk).  Even then that would be a lose of 350 miti to even out the armor quality.   When parsing the monk seemed to do just fine vs Blue +++ group mobs (we were duoing them).  On a fight where the monk used Tsunami he would take 200 total damage on average.  When he did not use it... it varied from 450-700 total damage .  The upper damage taken was also when I did not have my avoidance buffs on him.   We did not test Intercept effectivenesss.</P> <P>When I was tanking, I took 100-250 damage overall consistantly. Power consumption was large on both our parts when tanking... not so much while dpsing.</P> <P>The monk parsed about 10-20 dps higher than me on all fights when he was tanking and full defensive.  When I started tanking... my dps dropped 30dps lower than his on average.</P> <P>No testing has been done on raid mobs as of yet.   Anyone else have any "Guards buffing someone for a superior tank" numbers ?   </P> <P> </P> <P>Added:</P> <P>Its a monk parse yes and not in raids but, we are relatively the saem cept we do a tad more dps/miti and they are a tad more deflection/avoidance.</P></FONT></DIV></DIV><p>Message Edited by Gungo on <span class=date_text>09-03-2005</span> <span class=time_text>01:41 PM</span>