View Full Version : To all the Guardians.
Macross_JR
10-08-2005, 12:41 AM
This might make some of you mad but it needs to be said. Some people think that our intercept line is a joke(and quite frankly it is beyond a joke). Others say even if SOE makes them better they would be a waste. I have to disagree. I saw Tuna post on my other thread I started saying how he doesn't want to have to cast the intercept buff on the MT cause he doesn't want to be a buff bot(paraphrased at that). What I have to say is all other FIGHTERS have abilities to make other FIGHTERS TANK better. Guardians should be no different. I would be happy if: Our Protection Line was better, say Guardians TAKE 75% of the damage and Target TAKES 10% We had a self buff to buff our mitigation better, possibly change our Maddening Defense to add about 750 Mitigation(leave the rest alone) I also feel our Offensive Stance needs a bit of a tweak, it does take way to long to kill mobs solo for us, maybe add a haste part to it. Please comment on what I have said, I want to know how other Guardians and other Fighters feel. <div></div>
ThramFalc
10-08-2005, 01:03 AM
Whether our intercept remains in or is taken out, it makes little difference. As long as the other stuff gets fixed/improved I won't care. Your other ideas look good to me. We certainly need more mitigation buffs instead of avoidance buffs. <div></div>
TunaBoo
10-08-2005, 01:53 AM
In any case, we have no point. Worst dps. Equal tanking. Equal but different taunts. Equal but different resists. Worst utility. If we get worst dps and utility.. whats our benefit? <div></div>
lazlo1
10-08-2005, 02:05 AM
<span><blockquote><hr>TunaBoo wrote:In any case, we have no point. Worst dps. Equal tanking. Equal but different taunts. Equal but different resists. Worst utility. If we get worst dps and utility.. whats our benefit? <div></div><hr></blockquote>I have notice that no dev or brawler (they seem to hang out on our board) has even addressed this question. or this.... Equal tanking, Equal taunting, lowest dps, worst utility. How is that balanced ?</span><div></div>
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> lazlo1 wrote:<BR><SPAN><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> TunaBoo wrote:<BR>In any case, we have no point. Worst dps. Equal tanking. Equal but different taunts. Equal but different resists. Worst utility.<BR><BR>If we get worst dps and utility.. whats our benefit?<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>I have notice that no dev or brawler (they seem to hang out on our board) has even addressed this question.<BR><BR>or this....<BR><BR>Equal tanking, Equal taunting, lowest dps, worst utility. <BR>How is that balanced ?<BR></SPAN> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <P><BR><FONT face=Verdana color=#339900 size=1>Bingo~</FONT></P> <P><FONT face=Verdana color=#339900 size=1>How is it considered balanced, when the current gaps in Offensive capabilities (DPS) are so much larger across the fighter classes than the gaps in defensive abilitys (tanking)? Why play a defensive tank atm, when you can come so close to what a defensive tank can achieve, yet attain better utility and vastly better dps, by playing an offensive orientated fighter? Where is the apeal to play a Guardian?</FONT></P> <P><FONT face=Verdana color=#339900 size=1>I bet Guards would love to have a Self HoT to offset the steady stream of poorly mitigated damage they take, to balance themselfs with 'A' fighter class that takes less hits with higher damage spikes, but have mend to recover from it.</FONT></P> <P> </P> <P> </P> <p>Message Edited by Darton on <span class=date_text>10-08-2005</span> <span class=time_text>02:02 AM</span>
Moontayle
10-08-2005, 01:58 PM
<P>I believe the phrase is, "Show me the money!"</P> <P>In other words, if SOE has data that we're simply not seeing, I think this is time to dish it out. I know it's taboo to dish numbers but this is one case where it's necessary. There's a writing technique which is evident in almost every best seller you run across. It's called "Show, don't Tell." This means that you need to show the reader what's going on. Simply telling them will not get the point across.</P> <P>Don't tell us we're fine. Show us.</P>
Poochymama
10-08-2005, 06:15 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> TunaBoo wrote:<BR>In any case, we have no point. Worst dps. Equal tanking. Equal but different taunts. Equal but different resists. Worst utility.<BR><BR>If we get worst dps and utility.. whats our benefit?<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Actually Berserkers have the worst utility.
MainFra
10-08-2005, 06:21 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Poochymama p wrote:<BR><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> TunaBoo wrote:<BR>In any case, we have no point. Worst dps. Equal tanking. Equal but different taunts. Equal but different resists. Worst utility.<BR><BR>If we get worst dps and utility.. whats our benefit?<BR> <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Actually <FONT color=#cc0000>Berserkers have the worst utility</FONT>. <P><BR></P> <HR> <P>I have level 50 berserker. I know both warrior subclasses have problems atm.</P> <P>But lets get guardians straight first, since this is a guardian forum.</P> <P> </P></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.