View Full Version : Dual shields?
Khyzoth
05-24-2005, 01:30 AM
<DIV>Has anyone ever heard of the possibility of dual shielding (comparable to dual wielding)? I think it's only fair since MT's don't normally need to help with damage. The skill should be for Guardian only, of course.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Anybody this is a good or bad idea?</DIV>
tsaav
05-24-2005, 02:21 AM
hmm, i could see maybe dual bucklers... dual towers would be a bit odd looking tho. Maybe make towers 2-handed and increase their effectiveness to some multiplier higher then kite shields and then you might have something... fun idea <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> <div></div>
Khyzoth
05-24-2005, 02:34 AM
<DIV>I was thinking of two-handed tower shields really. It would look odd to hold two huge tower shields like you said. Add a nice protection proc and extra avoidance and I bet this would become fairly popular.</DIV>
SirDra
05-24-2005, 04:47 PM
<DIV><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Khyzoth wrote:<BR> <DIV>I think it's only fair since MT's don't normally need to help with damage. <BR> <HR> </DIV></BLOCKQUOTE>I parse 200+ dps a raid, guardians dont do damage....<BR></DIV>
carych
05-25-2005, 01:11 AM
Remember, damage isn't our *main* job, but still damage = threat. <div></div>
Scoonydog
05-25-2005, 07:02 PM
lol, you would get bored so fast with a two handed shield your head would spin. All you would do is just sit for awhile and have no damage, and if you didnt have adept taunts, forget about holding arrgo with no dps.
Shizzirri
05-25-2005, 11:08 PM
How many people in the middle ages or in fantasy novels or what ever ran around killing people with 2 shields or one incredibly large shield in their hands seriously the idea just sounds silly gimme my sword or a big old 2 hander and ill be happy.
And, try to picture, a morron enemy trying to hit a guy with a big shield, while others around skin him to death !!! hehe :mantongue:
tsaav
05-26-2005, 12:31 AM
<span><blockquote><hr>Shizzirri wrote:How many people in the middle ages or in fantasy novels or what ever ran around killing people with 2 shields or one incredibly large shield in their hands seriously the idea just sounds silly gimme my sword or a big old 2 hander and ill be happy. <div></div><hr></blockquote> Silly Romans.... </span><img src="http://www.graham.day.dsl.pipex.com/roman27.jpg"> <img src="http://www.caerleon.net/empire/img15.jpg"> <div></div>
Shizzirri
05-26-2005, 02:48 AM
Yeah I'll get laughed at by the mob for having two shields, the mob will ignore my taunts and go beat up the wizard who will then die then the group will boot me for giving them 1% debt omg fire me now!
Rhaam
05-26-2005, 05:26 PM
<DIV><BR></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> tsaavik wrote:<BR><SPAN><BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Shizzirri wrote:<BR>How many people in the middle ages or in fantasy novels or what ever ran around killing people with 2 shields or one incredibly large shield in their hands seriously the idea just sounds silly gimme my sword or a big old 2 hander and ill be happy. <BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR>Silly Romans....<BR></SPAN><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE> <DIV>And look where it got them!</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Ermm...good call.<BR></DIV>
Oakwood
05-26-2005, 08:28 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Rhaaman wrote:<BR> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr> <P>And look where it got them!</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>Got them a thousand year empire that controled/influenced their entire known world, and was only defeated by internal corruption and civil war because outside enemies could not overcome what was the greatest military power the world had ever known, or would know untill world war II, nearly 1500 after the fall.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>2500 years of unmatched martial supremacy? I'll take the tower shield =)</DIV>
Rhaam
05-29-2005, 10:51 PM
<BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Oakwood wrote:<BR> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> Rhaaman wrote:<BR> <DIV> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr> <P>And look where it got them!</P></BLOCKQUOTE> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE><BR> <DIV>Got them a thousand year empire that controled/influenced their entire known world, and was only defeated by internal corruption and civil war because outside enemies could not overcome what was the greatest military power the world had ever known, or would know untill world war II, nearly 1500 after the fall.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>2500 years of unmatched martial supremacy? I'll take the tower shield =)</DIV><BR> <HR> </BLOCKQUOTE>Exactly. I was being sarcastic.<BR>
OgApostrap
05-30-2005, 02:24 AM
<DIV>That just shows a formation... Those are all just towers.. notice they still have swords? lol.. Its not going to happen... </DIV>
Suretass
06-01-2005, 03:29 PM
<DIV>Woo, they had colour photos in 53BC?</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>We should be able to get groups of just guardians and do a Tortiose HO. Would rule!</DIV>
tsaav
06-03-2005, 10:02 PM
yes but their swords are sheated. About as usefull as having your sword in a bag <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /> When you are facing down a ^^^ drakota or chariot or whatever, that sword ain't gonna help you much <div></div>
Margen
06-07-2005, 01:18 PM
<P>SK lurker here, if you look at history they used the tortuse formation to advance on to archers and other "artillery". Once they reached the enemy lines and the archers became less a threat, the switched formation and they pulled out these sharp things called swords (think the name was Gladiuas, but could be wrong), and stabbed the enemy in the guts. You can't win a battle just using your shields, sorry, you have to have offensive capability too. </P> <P>Blackoath</P>
Ashtu
06-08-2005, 02:55 AM
<P>I would seriously hope any intelligent mob would go after the guy stabbing him in the back rather than the guy standing in front of him hiding behind a shield.</P> <P>Then again, even humanoid mobs aren't smart enough to figure out you should kill the healer first.</P>
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.