Serious question time. So now brawlers have: Defense, offensive, and far superior offensive stances?

[Cocytus]

<p>I'm trying to understand how it made sense to replace the middle stance instead of the offensive stance. I realize you can argue that mid stance was never used but at the very least I know some people used it after getting it while leveling up, and eventually after getting more AAs moved to other stances, but now...</p><p>The stances choices are defensive, poop offensive, and real offensive. I don't get the thinking.</p>

[Unkissable]

<p>+1</p>

[The_Cheeseman]

<p>I agree that "replacing" the combination stance with a stance that has a completely different function, especially when they just gave Recklessness to every other fighter class for free, kinda sucks. I never used the combination stance, so it isn't really a major deal in practice, but it just makes an update full of nerfs sting a little bit more.</p>

[Wigg]

<p>I used it on my monk to solo those areas that were a bit to hard to do offensive, but not bad enough to require full defensive stance.</p>

[Neobe]

<p>I miss the combin stance, it was my main stance for tanking. Yesterday i logged on and tried out a tank role and a dps role. The tanking was only in group heroic zones but in defence stance np, and the hit to my dps wasnt bad. I still would have rather been in combin stance to get a little extra dps. Some may ask why not just tank in off stance but im not a huge fan of that. I really cant say why just never had good luck in the off stance with dps or tanking. Now the new reck stance is just beast, parsing 450k on raid trash was very easy to do. So just from these two small test in the changes, i would have rather kept combin stance and drop the off stance.</p>