Any Hope for PvP?

[songsta]

<p>I'd like a response from a red name, if at all possible. But word on the street is there's plans for a rather large PvP oriented update? It would be about time, for years we've been a often chosen path for this game but to the best of my memory there has been little pvp oriented updates, we're always just reluctantly included in large PvE updates. It needs some polishing big time, I'm not going to sit here and list all of my "brilliant ideas" but I hope SoE is looking into doing SOMETHING to revive/kick start pvp. </p>

[Delethen]

<p><a href="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/preList.m?topic_id=507734&post_id=5682714" target="_blank">http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/...post_id=5682714</a></p>

[EQ2Playa432]

<p>An update on the changes would be nice, we are getting close if PvP's new era will still be launching in Feb.</p>

[Seliri]

<p><span style="color: #ff6600;">For a recap of the subject matter...</span></p><p><a href="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?topic_id=512266" target="_blank">No Surprises > Transparency pls > Track record o detachment > @Omougi @SOE: "Fix & not remove"...?</a></p><p><a href="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?topic_id=501059" target="_blank">Revised/Consolidated: 45 Points of Awesome-O for EQII PvP > EDITED 12-23-2011 1:11 AM -7 GMT</a></p>

[Rahatmattata]

<p>^ your thread titles are almost as bad as your posts</p><p>...almost</p>

[Seliri]

<p><cite>Malevolencexx@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>^ your thread titles are almost as bad as your posts</p><p>...almost</p></blockquote><p><span style="color: #ff6600;">clearly a jest given the lack of substantive & exhaustive analysis</span></p>

[Broan]

<p><cite>Warhawk@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>I'd like a response from a red name, if at all possible. But word on the street is there's plans for a rather large PvP oriented update? It would be about time, for years we've been a often chosen path for this game but to the best of my memory there has been little pvp oriented updates, we're always just reluctantly included in large PvE updates. It needs some polishing big time, I'm not going to sit here and list all of my "brilliant ideas" but I hope SoE is looking into doing SOMETHING to revive/kick start pvp. </p></blockquote><p>You seem fine w/ using npcs to win pvp 4 u, this is what you get for being carebearish and promoting mercs in pvp. deal w/ it.</p><p>remove mercs in pvp should be the first step SOE takes to fixing pvp.</p>

[Shadowous Nightwing]

<p><cite>Broan wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Warhawk@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>I'd like a response from a red name, if at all possible. But word on the street is there's plans for a rather large PvP oriented update? It would be about time, for years we've been a often chosen path for this game but to the best of my memory there has been little pvp oriented updates, we're always just reluctantly included in large PvE updates. It needs some polishing big time, I'm not going to sit here and list all of my "brilliant ideas" but I hope SoE is looking into doing SOMETHING to revive/kick start pvp. </p></blockquote><p>You seem fine w/ using npcs to win pvp 4 u, this is what you get for being carebearish and promoting mercs in pvp. deal w/ it.</p><p>remove mercs in pvp should be the first step SOE takes to fixing pvp.</p></blockquote><p>Warhawk has a valid concern about the state of pvp in EQ2 and  Idon't see where he is talking about mercs in this post so STOP TROLLING</p>

[Twinbladed]

<p>I don't think they care nor look into pvp that much. </p><p>This is what make 0 sense to me:</p><p>Damage is higher than player health, so we were supose to use cm adorns, but yeah I can pop one temp an gameover someone in 2 seconds, this goes for all major dps classes, the only flip side is if a healer has a lot of cm, but now you have to sacrifice 1 stat for another, instead of the gear coming with good crit mit, u need to buy it. Nothing is class specific anymore, except adorments. If you play a shaman you lucked out in pvp pretty much, unless you have another healer with you. SOE says pve gear will not work in pvp, then turns around and allows some of the best x4  jewelry to work. The mercs are busted, we put that on fraps, I let a level 56 wizard merc hit me with 32k elemental and 33k arcane resist on, an was hitting me for 4 and 500 a pop. This system is fail. The kicker is, no one is willing to get rid of the pve stats that works in pvp. No one should be multi attacking over 100%, flurry should not be a proc that works 50% of the time. Auto attack should not be 33% of you dps, spell da, and spell auto attack was also a horrid idea to put in pvp, dps mod should cap out for pvp, and I don't see any point in potency and crit bonus in pvp. If all the blue stats were not capable of being so high, it would even out the playing feild a lot better than it is now. PvP is treated to much like Pve. Except we don't get 6mil hp to go with it.</p>

[songsta]

<p><cite>Broan wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Warhawk@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>I'd like a response from a red name, if at all possible. But word on the street is there's plans for a rather large PvP oriented update? It would be about time, for years we've been a often chosen path for this game but to the best of my memory there has been little pvp oriented updates, we're always just reluctantly included in large PvE updates. It needs some polishing big time, I'm not going to sit here and list all of my "brilliant ideas" but I hope SoE is looking into doing SOMETHING to revive/kick start pvp. </p></blockquote><p>You seem fine w/ using npcs to win pvp 4 u, this is what you get for being carebearish and promoting mercs in pvp. deal w/ it.</p><p>remove mercs in pvp should be the first step SOE takes to fixing pvp.</p></blockquote><p>I play an illy, a class that cant take much of a hit, so when I'm fighting against people who use mercs it really leaves me</p><p>No option, I can't fight 1v1 against a white pally who's got a Nero or a wiz merc. I can't handle the dps and burn a pally who only gotta stand there and heal. It's flawed, ad although they do pve like damage they unfortunately cannot be chain mezzed like pve mobs. I refuse to cripple myself and die alot for the sake of people who USE mercs, telling me I'm bad bc I use one. I'm all for them getting removed. I forgot Broan was all mighty pvp god, I've been pvping since launch, I'm by no means the best but I'd pvp circles around you.</p>

[Broan]

<p><cite>Warhawk@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Broan wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Warhawk@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>I'd like a response from a red name, if at all possible. But word on the street is there's plans for a rather large PvP oriented update? It would be about time, for years we've been a often chosen path for this game but to the best of my memory there has been little pvp oriented updates, we're always just reluctantly included in large PvE updates. It needs some polishing big time, I'm not going to sit here and list all of my "brilliant ideas" but I hope SoE is looking into doing SOMETHING to revive/kick start pvp. </p></blockquote><p>You seem fine w/ using npcs to win pvp 4 u, this is what you get for being carebearish and promoting mercs in pvp. deal w/ it.</p><p>remove mercs in pvp should be the first step SOE takes to fixing pvp.</p></blockquote><p> I forgot Broan was all mighty pvp god.</p></blockquote><p>Least you got this right.</p>

[Sexyman]

<p>LOL,</p><p>I remember Warhawk, horrible ranger when i used to play. He was a locked twink at the time. Jesus christ i owned him on my Berserker when i was barely getting him up to par with all the damm t4 twinks. I can't believe you still play bro must still suck.</p>