Matchmakeing at it's best...

[Nagel]

<p><img src="http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/uu49/vitality09/EQ2_000126.jpg" width="1023" height="627" /></p><p>This is not the first time this has happened, or the opppsing team will get 3-4 healers, and our side gets 12 people and no healer....</p>

[Caraleah]

*giggle*

[KolatTDSt41p]

<p>LOL!</p><p>I even quickly punched in some of those names thinking that it could be possible that 6 of them might have grouped up to run some Battlegrounds. As I said I only typed in the names quickly, but didn't come up with more than two people from the same server.</p><p>At least you had one friend though right <img src="/smilies/283a16da79f3aa23fe1025c96295f04f.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />.</p><p>And you would have gotten 1 token for only a few minutes work. That is better than the other bug where you get an entire x4 raid on each team in that instance. Those games are crazy and generally a team wins when the clock runs down.</p>

[Blambil]

<p>Been in quite a few 3,4, or 5 on 1 gears matches... not sure what was "stuck" but usually about 5 minutes into the match, help starts showing up.</p>

[Harbringer Doom]

<p>Yeah, was in a Ganak last night that was 4 vs. 12.</p><p>We just barely eeked out a win. </p><p>Kudos to the SK and Inquis who would just not give up.</p>

[Luhai]

<p>Unfortunately this happens all the time. Yesterday we were fighting 4on5. 0 Healers on our side and 3 on the other.</p><p>Whoever is responsible for the balancing might want to reconsider a few things...</p>

[Rothgar]

<p>Looking at the logfiles, some of these issues are most likely caused by players declining a match once the matchmaker has put it together.  The matchmaker will then attempt to backfill people, but if there isn't enough people in the player pool, it could lead to some unbalanced matches.</p>

[Nagel]

<p>we just had a 13vs4 in Ganak..</p>

[Rothgar]

<p><cite>Nagel@Antonia Bayle wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>we just had a 13vs4 in Ganak..</p></blockquote><p>We're looking into it.  Hopefully we'll have an answer soon.</p>

[Blambil]

<p>Queue Visibility Please : <a href="http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/posts/list.m?topic_id=479502" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://forums.station.sony.com/eq2/...topic_id=479502</a></p>

[Nagel]

<p>Thank  you</p>

[Writer Cal]

<p>Also, the ability to queue fore more than one BG map without having to queue for all might help, if part of the problem really is people declining matches.</p><p>As it is, if someone wants to run either of two maps but not the third, they would either have to queue only for one and possibly wait longer until there were enough people, or queue for ALL and decline the offers for the map they don't want to run.  Rinse, repeat, until one of the two desired maps is offered.</p>

[leliloe]

<p><cite>Daenee@Antonia Bayle wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>Also, the ability to queue fore more than one BG map without having to queue for all might help, if part of the problem really is people declining matches.</p><p>As it is, if someone wants to run either of two maps but not the third, they would either have to queue only for one and possibly wait longer until there were enough people, or queue for ALL and decline the offers for the map they don't want to run.  Rinse, repeat, until one of the two desired maps is offered.</p></blockquote><p>Especially for declining gears. Very few people keep running it because they need tokens or aa (and why would we queue for gears if we don't need those tokens, since the relic change killed fun in it?). But well, i guess Soe will not work on something that could hurt a zone a little bit more?</p>

[Prestissimo]

<p>10 out of 14 games tonight in gears... 0 healers and 0 utility on my team, 4 out of those 10 the other team had a healer AND utility over us, and the other 6 of the 10, the other team had 2 healers AND a utility. The other 4 matches were acceptable (IE both teams had at least 1 healer, dps, tank, utility.)</p><p>Someone seriously needs to learn how to code.</p>

[Nagel]

<p>We get this problem all the time, 2 corcers, 1 illy, 1sk, 1templar, 1warden on there team, and just 3 on our team, zerker, wiz, conj. thats all.</p><p>Or 3 sk's 2healers and 1 illy or corcer on there team, and on our side, 1zerker, 1 wiz, 1conj, 1sk, That is all..</p><p>I'm so sick of Gears at this point, i have close to 80 tokens after getting my boots, gloves, and BP, but that is all i can get cause we have YET to see a Smugglers Den BG, we sat in que with a x3 raid force for 3 hours the one night before we just gave up, we had no clue what the deal was, now we wait 30-60mins trying to run Ganak hoping it's going to start the one day we waited well over 1hour. I know we would truely appricate a Visual Que System.</p>

[tantric]

<p>I had 2 matches Last week that were 17vs 4 in Ganak and one 15vs5 in ganak..... all I can figure is someone had most of a group queued and it got confused.</p><p>I did not complain cause I was on the winning side and got 3 tokens and was out in less than 2 min and queueing another</p>

[Peak]

<p><img src="http://i49.tinypic.com/jqkfuv.jpg" width="1360" height="742" /></p><p>25 vs 25</p><p>Yes, /who said we had 50 people in Gears.</p><p>Someone had more than an x4.</p>

[Blambil]

<p>not to cross post, but I just came out of a Ganak match that showed 81 players on my side alone (an x13??) ... it was CRAZZZY..</p>