View Full Version : Your Preview Said Two New Raid Zones
Claraness
04-27-2010, 11:55 AM
<p>The preview in the news archives mentions a raid zone in The Hole for this update. Funny how that snuck it's way out of the notes....</p>
EvilAstroboy
04-27-2010, 12:17 PM
<p>Shhhh youll ruin the suprise for GU67! More delayed content packaged as a GU.</p>
Alfeo
04-27-2010, 12:30 PM
<p>Not even a full week ago, Gninja stated there were some new raids coming up in this GU when he was reassuring people that the GU would have plenty of neat things in it. If he had a strong indication that the hole raid wouldn't be coming in this GU I doubt he would have worded it like that. As far as I know, the GU is slated for late may so that gives us about a month before its released and imo it makes sense to test the raid zones on test one at a time rather than throwing them both out on the servers at once. Especially with three-four weeks til the GU is supposed to be out anyways.</p><p>I think you are being way premature at this point at saying its going to be pushed back just because its not initially on the test server. Imo, its better to wait and see at this point. I'm not saying its impossible for the zone to be delayed but rather there is not sufficient evidence to suggest that this must be the case at this time.</p>
Nevao
04-27-2010, 01:09 PM
<p><span style="color: #ff9900;">I would read very little into the fact that the zone was not announced/is not in yet (not sure which is true as I haven't had a chance to get on Test for any length of time yet). They are pushing out a lot of content this go around I'm guessing they are having push it to test in chunks.</span></p>
Leovinus
04-27-2010, 01:46 PM
<p>If you go to the third door to the hole on test(copy), you now get a message about not being able to enter without 24 players in group. I haven't been on test(copy) enough to be in a fully formed raid to try again though, so I can't speak beyond this. Perhaps it's not really ready for testing yet, so they're not drawing much attention to it (and sticking a 24 man lower limit to diminish chances of a PUR getting in).</p>
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.