PDA

View Full Version : Confused about stealth and sneak

Tracey_1
08-12-2009, 07:19 PM
<p>Have eviserate and ambush that require sneak. But I dont think i have a special for sneak.</p><p>Its confusing which specials require stealth and those that require sneak. Can one even sneak in combat? If not, then an assassinate can not use eviserate and ambush while in combat. Is this corrects? Please comment.</p><p>ty</p>
Aeralik
08-12-2009, 10:17 PM
<p>Sneak and Stealth are both used to mean the same thing and work with both of the skills you have listed. <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />  Stealth, Slip Away, Stalk, and the Masked Strike line will all put you into a qualifying stealth for Eviscerate and Ambush. </p>
Zin`Car
08-21-2009, 10:53 AM
<p><cite>Aeralik wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>Sneak and Stealth are both used to mean the same thing and work with both of the skills you have listed. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" />  Stealth, Slip Away, Stalk, and the Masked Strike line will all put you into a qualifying stealth for Eviscerate and Ambush. </p></blockquote><p>You forgot concealment... and i wish it were that cut and dry.. then obfusication would be of more value.</p>
Brimestar
08-26-2009, 11:39 AM
<p>that would be money if it did</p>
Zin`Car
08-26-2009, 02:52 PM
<p><cite>Brimestar wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>that would be money if it did</p></blockquote><p>unfortunately, it's going to remain nothing more than a pipe dream... kinda like expecting a dev to actually respond to that very issue... just not gonna happen.</p>
Brimestar
08-26-2009, 11:28 PM
<p>THe fact Aerilak posted here at least shows someone reads this forum.</p>
Zin`Car
08-27-2009, 11:23 AM
<p>that's like saying "the fact that plat sellers log into game shows that EQ2 does indeed have players."</p><p>The obsufication (sp?) thing has been an issue of question since it was introduced.</p><p>that and him forgetting to mention Concealment (unless by some far reaching stretch of the imagination he assumed the OP wasn't high enough or didn't want to assume he was... to worry about that mentioning that spell)</p>