Inquisitor inqusition

[Orion]

<p>Not only is this completely useless on the pvp server due to the fact it also heals the enemy but it also way behind the usefulness of the templars repent with the high resists in pvp and in raids.</p><p>Can we please either get the bug fixed on pvp server or have the skill as a whole looked at.  maybe tuning the resistibility or changing how the skill works. </p><p>The bug has been present on the pvp servers for months if not years.</p>

[FlyingTiger]

<p>I agree soe needs to be more inquistive with the inquisitor inqusition.</p>

[Cyst]

<p>Inquisition should be a temporary buff that goes on us, and heals those allies within 20 meters of us. The spell resists far too much in PvE, and PvP.</p>

[Orthureon]

<p><cite>Cyst@Venekor wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>Inquisition should be a temporary buff that goes on us, and heals those allies within 20 meters of us. The spell resists far too much in PvE, and PvP.</p></blockquote><p>Not to mention Inquisition uses the crits of the person we put it on... ROFLOL! How useless will that spell be in PVP with the crit consolidation coming up? I mean right now it is just like sitting on my hotbar, I think it has some mold and dust on it.</p><p>Now if they did it the way an Inquisitor should it would be WAY better. It should drain the mobs/person health for about 75% the amount it heals for. Or perhaps a free spell, you cast it on the mob/person it uses their power but heals you. So it would be like a power drain/heal all in one!</p>

[Avirodar]

<p>I'd be all for Inquisition being completely replaced. Right now, it is a massive pile of trash that I almost never use. To say Inqs got the short end of the stick for level 80 cleric heals, is an understatement, when you compare Inquisitor Inquisition to Templar Repent.Even if Inquisition was changed to be castable on myself, or an ally, there will still be one fundamental problem, it will rarely heal anything that actually helps. It may heal some fluff damage (inconsequential) and pad the heal parse a tiny bit, but the HoT nature of the spell and the amount it heals for will be insignificant when competing with wards, reactives and group heals.If actual HEALING needs to be done, Inquisition is the last spell on my mind.</p><p>I have never thought "ouch, that hurt, cast Inquisuition quick!".I have never thought "A lot of damage is coming, precast Inquisition"That alone should sum it up.</p>

[Cyst]

<p>In light of the druid changes coming with the next expansion, they really need to at least change the inquisition spell.</p>

[Cyst]

<p>I still think it should be a temporary self buff that goes on us, and heals everyone within 20 meters to us. I would even take it a step forward and add a knock back component to the temporary buff that would knock back those hitting us, 5% of the time.</p><p>After all Wardens have Sandstorm (one of the best defensive ability for a group in the game), the best PvP heals in the game, unlimited power, and Shaman's now have Bane Warding.</p>

[Bloodfa]

<p>And Wardens wear leather.  Sandstorm is a bit much to ask for on a plate wearing healer, especially when you take into consideration the way that many Inquisitors will plainly tell the gaming community just how solid they are in PvP.  I mean, yeah, push to get it to work properly, but seriously, asking to get it fixed <em>and</em> boosted so that they're nigh-invulnerable?  That's getting greedy. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p>

[Cyst]

<p><cite>Bloodfang@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>And Wardens wear leather.  Sandstorm is a bit much to ask for on a plate wearing healer, especially when you take into consideration the way that many Inquisitors will plainly tell the gaming community just how solid they are in PvP.  I mean, yeah, push to get it to work properly, but seriously, asking to get it fixed <em>and</em> boosted so that they're nigh-invulnerable?  That's getting greedy. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" /></p></blockquote><p>I'm not asking for Sandstorm, it does more than a self only knock back, and lasts 3 minutes, and gives mitigation FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP, INCLUDING THE PLATE WEARERS!! Inquisition only lasts 30 seconds. Even with a knock back component, how could it even possibly compare? Seriously?</p><p>Have you checked a Wardens mitigation self buffed? It is as if they're wearing plate too. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" /></p><p>The Warden is hands down the BEST PvP healer in the game, while the Inquisitor shines solo (not nearly as good as the Warden). And they are going to make the Warden a better healer come next expansion. Come on man, throw the least played healer in the game a bone.</p><p>P.S. What makes the Inquisitor a beast is the gear available to them, the same gear available to every other healer in the game. Let us not base the effectiveness of a class by its gear, because if you strip that gear, the Inquisitor is half as good as all the other healers.</p>

[Emolad]

<p>Ahoy mateys!! Arrg that inq mythical is overpowered arrggg it needs a nerf arrg!!</p>

[Cyst]

<p><cite>Emolad@Vox wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>Ahoy mateys!! Arrg that inq mythical is overpowered arrggg it needs a nerf arrg!!</p></blockquote><p>The Inquisitor Mythical is the only thing keeping them close to the other healers. And after the next expansion, that won't help the Inquisitor anymore.</p>

[Emolad]

<p>aarrg matey! don't ask for buffs when you have the insanely op mythical. avast ye!</p>

[Bloodfa]

<p><cite>Cyst@Venekor wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Bloodfang@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>And Wardens wear leather.  Sandstorm is a bit much to ask for on a plate wearing healer, especially when you take into consideration the way that many Inquisitors will plainly tell the gaming community just how solid they are in PvP.  I mean, yeah, push to get it to work properly, but seriously, asking to get it fixed <em>and</em> boosted so that they're nigh-invulnerable?  That's getting greedy. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" /></p></blockquote><p>I'm not asking for Sandstorm, it does more than a self only knock back, and lasts 3 minutes, and gives mitigation FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP, INCLUDING THE PLATE WEARERS!! Inquisition only lasts 30 seconds. Even with a knock back component, how could it even possibly compare? Seriously?</p><p>Have you checked a Wardens mitigation self buffed? It is as if they're wearing plate too. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" /></p><p>The Warden is hands down the BEST PvP healer in the game, while the Inquisitor shines solo (not nearly as good as the Warden). And they are going to make the Warden a better healer come next expansion. Come on man, throw the least played healer in the game a bone.</p><p>P.S. What makes the Inquisitor a beast is the gear available to them, the same gear available to every other healer in the game. Let us not base the effectiveness of a class by its gear, because if you strip that gear, the Inquisitor is half as good as all the other healers.</p></blockquote><p>As a matter of fact, I have 2 Wardens.<img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" />  So yes, I have an idea of what their mit is like; it comes at the cost of concentration slots and AP points to increase our buffs.  But come on, are you saying an Inquisitor is going to be considered a [Removed for Content] for PvP?  Or PvE?  Knockback?  AOE nukes wouldn't burn through the healer, while he's keeping his group alive while they melee everybody else, and anyone trying to get close enough to melee the healer gets knocked back?  I think it's a bit much.  If they fix the spell to actually work right, I'd say it would be pretty freaking good on its' own.</p><p>I'll agree with you, I think the Warden is the best PvP healer.  Doesn't mean that a broken spell from another class needs to be amped way the hell up, when all it needs is to be fixed.</p>

[Cyst]

<p><cite>Bloodfang@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Cyst@Venekor wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p><cite>Bloodfang@Nagafen wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>And Wardens wear leather.  Sandstorm is a bit much to ask for on a plate wearing healer, especially when you take into consideration the way that many Inquisitors will plainly tell the gaming community just how solid they are in PvP.  I mean, yeah, push to get it to work properly, but seriously, asking to get it fixed <em>and</em> boosted so that they're nigh-invulnerable?  That's getting greedy. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" /></p></blockquote><p>I'm not asking for Sandstorm, it does more than a self only knock back, and lasts 3 minutes, and gives mitigation FOR THE ENTIRE GROUP, INCLUDING THE PLATE WEARERS!! Inquisition only lasts 30 seconds. Even with a knock back component, how could it even possibly compare? Seriously?</p><p>Have you checked a Wardens mitigation self buffed? It is as if they're wearing plate too. <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" /></p><p>The Warden is hands down the BEST PvP healer in the game, while the Inquisitor shines solo (not nearly as good as the Warden). And they are going to make the Warden a better healer come next expansion. Come on man, throw the least played healer in the game a bone.</p><p>P.S. What makes the Inquisitor a beast is the gear available to them, the same gear available to every other healer in the game. Let us not base the effectiveness of a class by its gear, because if you strip that gear, the Inquisitor is half as good as all the other healers.</p></blockquote><p>As a matter of fact, I have 2 Wardens.<img src="/eq2/images/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" />  So yes, I have an idea of what their mit is like; it comes at the cost of concentration slots and AP points to increase our buffs.  But come on, are you saying an Inquisitor is going to be considered a [Removed for Content] for PvP?  Or PvE?  Knockback?  AOE nukes wouldn't burn through the healer, while he's keeping his group alive while they melee everybody else, and anyone trying to get close enough to melee the healer gets knocked back?  I think it's a bit much.  If they fix the spell to actually work right, I'd say it would be pretty freaking good on its' own.</p><p>I'll agree with you, I think the Warden is the best PvP healer.  Doesn't mean that a broken spell from another class needs to be amped way the hell up, when all it needs is to be fixed.</p></blockquote><p>The Inquisitor is far from gimped in a one on one situation. They're among the most powerful solo classes in the game. But lets face it, this is a group based game, and you can not judge a class by their solo abilities. Match a Defiler, Mystic (awesome power gain on Mythical), or Templar with a Warden, and the Inquisitor is the crappiest group on group healer in comparison.</p><p>It is pretty sad that the Fury, which does not shine in T8 PvP is still a much better healer than the Inquisitor, and the Warden is so good, they are a MUST HAVE for any group, for PvP. You say you play TWO Wardens, so you're used to having it all, yet you don't want to throw a bone to the most underplayed healer in the game?</p><p>Roll an Inquisitor, play them at least until 65, and see what I'm talking about. I've played my wifes Mysthic, her defiler, and her Warden. I've also played Joemomma's Templar. It is no comparison until you get the gear all healers can use. The Inquisitor hands down is the worst group on group healer in the game. So what they can solo, and do well one vs one.</p>

[Cyst]

<p><cite>Emolad@Vox wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>aarrg matey! don't ask for buffs when you have the insanely op mythical. avast ye!</p></blockquote><p>You play a Crusader. You have no room to call anything overpowered. <img src="/smilies/8a80c6485cd926be453217d59a84a888.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p>

[Bloodfa]

<p><cite>Cyst@Venekor wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>The Inquisitor is far from gimped in a one on one situation. They're among the most powerful solo classes in the game. But lets face it, this is a group based game, and you can not judge a class by their solo abilities. Match a Defiler, Mystic (awesome power gain on Mythical), or Templar with a Warden, and the Inquisitor is the crappiest group on group healer in comparison.</p><p>It is pretty sad that the Fury, which does not shine in T8 PvP is still a much better healer than the Inquisitor, and the Warden is so good, they are a MUST HAVE for any group, for PvP. You say you play TWO Wardens, so you're used to having it all, yet you don't want to throw a bone to the most underplayed healer in the game?</p><p>Roll an Inquisitor, play them at least until 65, and see what I'm talking about. I've played my wifes Mysthic, her defiler, and her Warden. I've also played Joemomma's Templar. It is no comparison until you get the gear all healers can use. The Inquisitor hands down is the worst group on group healer in the game. So what they can solo, and do well one vs one.</p></blockquote><p>I already called them great PvP healers.  But ... I solo in most situations, whichever character.  So do a lot of other Wardens; I know, I find them on my Swash.  Whether you want to call it a group based game or not, the game has become more & more solo friendly.  You say you cannot judge a class by their solo abilities; I contend that you are wrong on that assumption, as half the server solo's, and the majority of people leveling up an alt, or new players, are doing it solo.  Yin, meet yang. </p><p><span style="color: #00ccff;">"You say you play TWO Wardens, so you're used to having it all, yet you don't want to throw a bone to the most underplayed healer in the game?"</span>  Seriously? Okay, whatever.  I've got a Warden at 65 and another at 55.  The 65 is shelved, and brought out once in a blue moon to help friends in a different guild.  The 55 is an anonymous toon on a second account (I'm having fun with that one, and 2-boxing lower leveled alts).  Neither is endgame, but both can take on the classes that I have trouble with on my Swash, yellow conned, and win almost every time.  I played a Warden on Blackburrow to 50 when that was endgame, and a Beast-lord on EQ1.  I like the class, always have. </p><p>But that's besides the point.  The spell needs to be fixed.  It hasn't been fixed yet, so you really don't know just how effective it will be in actuality, yet you're asking for it to be bumped.  If you don't see that as looking for a little much, I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. </p>

[Jeht]

<p>aarrggg cyst he plays an illy!</p>