Crusader Wisdom AA Line

[Cyrdemac]

<p>Just a short question. Since the third point in Wisdom Line from Crusader tree adds every possibly melee, ranged or spell skill to the group, would it be inbalanced to add aggression to the list? Aggression was introduced far after the changes to that tree and is essential and as same important as the other boosted skills here.</p>

[Cyrdemac]

<p>Nobody even interested in saying something to this question? <img src="/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" alt="SMILEY" /></p>

[Detor]

<p><cite>Cyrdemac wrote:</cite></p><blockquote><p>Nobody even interested in saying something to this question? <img src="/eq2/images/smilies/3b63d1616c5dfcf29f8a7a031aaa7cad.gif" border="0" /></p></blockquote><p>What's there to say?  There isn't a lot of things to say against it, but then most paladins have a set plan in mind right now with what they're going with (and the WIS line is almost definately not in their ideal AA setup) so they don't feel a big push to get it improved either.  If they did add aggression to the WIS line's skill buff that would just make the line another decision that a player has to rethink and pick and choose what AAs they want and what other AAs they'd give up to go for the WIS line.</p>

[Cyrdemac]

<p>The additional option for alternate AA-speccing is the idea of this question. Guardians can spec away their to-hit penalties from their def stance, and with wisdom line, we could too..the only reason we dont do it, is of the cost of points and the depth of this buff in the line.</p><p>Adding aggression for more accurate taunts might encourage Crusaders to rethink about wisdom line again. Just trying to find solutions to close the gap between Guardian and Paladin (where by the new definition of single target tank shouldnt even BE a gap at all).</p>

[Wytie]

<p>The Wis line needs a huge boost, double just about everything and it might just be usefull.</p>